TNAG-1657-FCO40-2305-Daya-Bay-nuclear-power-station-project-safety-concerns-in-Ho-1987 — Page 120

布政司署

香港下亞厘畢道

Litter stel Bour

BU AML 29

13.

GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT

LOWER ALBERT ROAD

HONG KONG

How Leeks

DIFU

ETV

DRC

OUR REF.:

ESB CR 1/2061/84 VIII

13 January 1987

ME YOUR REF.:

we

Dr. David M. Levey,

Overseas Relations Branch

82%

11, Charles II Street,

London SW1Y 4QP,

United Kingdom.

HKK 166/1

MECEIVED IN REGISTAY

United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority,

22 JAN 1987

TREGISTRY

Sezian Triang

DRMY

B9D=X

:

ASFALT BAL

M

Layden Lallash

C

dat lebte to D En, da

This lab

опийно.

PR weigh in

with

Eu.

(I'm happy

to speal y you think that wowed be better.)

Kuth 201

Annex A

Annex B

Annex C

ball to MK; bult seen by Myleeb

We are becoming increasingly concerned over the lack of communication from Harwell concerning our consultancy on the environmental aspects of the Daya Bay nuclear power station project.

As you will recall, it was agreed when John Wilson, Graham Osborne and Dr. Wong met with Dr. Wade, yourself and other members of the Authority last August that, as a result of the post Chernobyl concerns in Hong Kong, the need to make Harwell's reports available to the public in Hong Kong was an additional requirement, not originally envisaged, that now needed

to be taken into account.

With this in mind it was agreed during the August meetings that, in respect to the contingency plan report, a structure for a summary report would be submitted to Hong Kong together with a cost and timescale estimate (paragraph 6 of the 'Note for the Record' of the meeting in the UK - at Annex A). envisaged that, subject to the acceptance of Harwell's proposals, the summary report could be made available around the end of 1986.

It was

Although we were advised in a letter from Ms Jane Secher dated 19 September 1986 (copy at Annex B) that the estimated cost of producing the summary report on contingency planning would be £45,300, we were not provided with details of the proposed structure. Subsequently, Dr. Wade informed us, in a letter dated 28 October 1986 (copy at Annex C) that he expected to be able to send us an outline of the proposed report

quite soon'.

21

Page 120Page 121