483
всплый
1967.
to Clarke..
987
A.
16050 00
Yes, after having been once recommended, it is quite
possible, because any subsequent correspondence is only
on matters of detail.
That is all the more reason why the Secretary of the
Department should know what is going on.
Vr Shelton Hooper:- Dont you think the Secretary should know, for the
A.
81
9.
A.
02 2.
↑
8.3 9.
purpose of record
16080
Not necessarily, when there is a record in the Colonial
Secretary's office.
I mean to say, Departmental ?
I dont think it is necessary.
16.087
Can you conceive the Secretary abusing his position by
misusing information he might get through seeing such
documents ?
It is possible to conosive anything. I am not anticipat-
ing.
16083
What I mean to say is: Do you think that the fecretary,
being a Government officer of the standing that they
give to that officer, is likely to misuse such
information ?
No, no.
84
Q.
A.
160874
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
537
361
Then what is your objection ? What objection have you
in your mind to the Secretary seeing the information ?
I have not raised any objection. I don't think it is
ngential, and what is more, it is a question whether
he has got “he time.
Now, what other reasons ?
8520
16.0857
A.
It may he a purely technical question, which is being
discussed, and which he went understand the ins and
outs of.
.I
16006
862
Dont you think that there are purely technical discuss o
by the sanitary Board and the public, that he himself
RECORD OFFICE, OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
LONDON