}
t
In Hous
1968.
For Cake
988 Cab
has no technical knowledge of in the same way, and yet
he is admitted to the confidence of the Board, and
records those papers and documents ?
A.
Yes.
16057
Q.
Podgnt that destroy your argument ?
16.087
A.
No, I am merely saying it is not necessary. I dont know
of any objection to his seeing them.
$$ 9.
For the purposes of record ?
16.088
A.
Mone whatever. The only records he can make in to make
2.
A.
The Chairman:-
16090.
། ་། ། ། །
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
lumiminik
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
a copy of it, but of course that may go on and be
endless.
16089
There may be nothing in regard to records, filing them,
and for referance?
As far as I know, he does see everything, except
confidential papers, because they are sent to be copied,
-
and they are in his custody, the copies.
of any papers, to which he has not access.
I dont know
16.090
Why should there be any correspondence which he should not see. He is a confidential officer, and can be
trusted as much as the P. C. M. 0.
I dont think it is necessary to lay that before the
Secretary.
16.091.
I am talking about correspondenos ahout matters relating
to a refuse destructor, or something of that sort,
directly relating to the Sanitary Department.
These would not be confidential.
Is it not a fact that such correspondence has been t6092
T
carried on by you as P. C. X. 0. direct with the
Government, of which the Secretary has had no knowledge). Vary little, I should think, except it is confidential.
But I dont know what you call nonfidential ?
Papara marked "bonfidential".
16.093
A.
gi
Q..
A.
93.2.
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Page 110Page 111
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.