28

FORM 38.

[ss. 20 & 65.]

29

Therefore the said forfeiture is hereby cancelled (or mitigated to the sum of

Dated this

1

day of

19

Adjudication of forfeiture of recognizance where person bound as principal has been ennvicted of an offence which is a breach of the condition.

Before

IN THE MADistrate's Court at

sitting at the said court.

[LS.]

A

Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony,

19

·

Magistrate.

The

day of

zance entered into the the sum of

that

F

(hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recogni-

day of

19

bound in the condition of the recognizance being of

should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having been given that the said

has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence), being an offence which is in law a breach of the condition of the said recognizance:

Therefore it is adjudged that the said recognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the magistrates' clerk [or other person specified) the said sum of

and do also pay to

the *um of

for costs; and it is ordered that the said suma be paid forthwith for on or before the

day of

19 or by instalments of

for every

first instalment to be paid forthwith or on or before the of

days, the

day

19 ); and if default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordened [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress, or omit as the case may be].

Form 40.

Summons to attend an application for varying or dispensing with sureties,

Hanet Kano

Τα

IN THE MAGIstrate's CouRT AT

of

-

ot

19

>

on

(83. 28 & 62.)

You are bereby summoned to appear before a magistrate of the said Colony sitting at

day the

day o'clock in the

moon, to show cause why the amount for which it is proposed that the surety (or suretics)

of

should be bound should not be reduced (or why the obligation of

to find a surety for sureties) should not be dispensed with).

Dated this

(L.B.)

day of

19

Magistrate.

[LS.)

FORM 39.

Magistrate.

FORM 41

(s. 62.]

HÙNG

IN THE MAGIstrate's ColRT AT

Before

Order varying order for sureties,

Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony,

[ss. 28 & 65.]

sitting at the said court.

The

day of

19

Order cancelling or mitigating forfeiture of recognizance, (To be endorsed on recognizance).

HONG KONG

IN THE MAGIStrate's CourT AT

Before

*

sitting at the said court.

Esquire, a magistrate of the said Colony,

day of

19

1

A warrant of distress was, on the issued for levying the sum of

declared to be forfeited under the within-written recognizance, but no goods have been sold there- under, and the said

has applied to ms, the undersigned,

to cancel (or mitigate) the forfeiture of the said recognizance, and has given security to my satisfaction for the future performance of the condi- tion of the said recognizance, and has paid (or given security for payment of the costs incurred in respect of the forfeiture thereof [or insert such other condition as the magistrate may think just];

has been, under a warrant of commitment dated day of

19 , and issued by this court, committed to prison for default In finding sureties for a surety] in the sum of

and, on new evidente having been produced to me for on proot of a change of circumstances having been given to me), it seems to me just to vary, io manner hereinafter appearing, the order under which the said warrant was issued:

Therefore it is ordered that the amount for which it is proposed that the surety for sureties) of the said

should be bound be reduced to

for that the obligation of the said find a surety for sureties) be dispensed with) [or ay may be directed].

[L]

Magistrate.

Share This Page