Date:
25.11.86
Time:
Reporter:
2.15
PMS
1
5 pm
You are in the process of formulating
CHAIRMAN:
2 criteria for determining school fees.
D of E:
Mr Chairman, I should add that in 1978
the White Paper of course did not mention the basis for revision
of fees.
3
ad,
4
5
6
7
ลง เก
8
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
(1)
18
er
19
In
ons
21
22
CHAIRMAN:
Yes.
D of E:
All it said was a reasonable share of
the cost should be borne by the public.
CHAIRMAN:
I understand.
20
D of E:
It didn't say what percentage, so it is
a very vague kind of intention, subject to interpretation.
CHAIRMAN:
MR CHEONG:
Yes, I understand.
Has there been any indication as what is
being reasonable as the percentage of the cost to be borne by the
public?
23
24
ooked
(1)
D of E:
We did work out a basis in the '78 fees
25
and it amounted to about 15% of the original cost of those fees. So applying that 15% we are now trying to recover that 15% in the 27 next five years.
28
29
22 23
CHAIRMAN:
Yes, fine. Mr Lee.
26
ation
is
32
th
15
30
31
33
MR LEE:
Yes. Mr Director, may I refer to paragraph 15 of the Director of Audit's report. You did begin to revise, to review the level of school fees in October 1984 and the present revision of school fees was approved by the Governor in Council in July this
year. That means you have taken 20 months to complete this review.
Do you think that it is a reasonable duration in which such a review
34
nber
35
36
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.