14
1
2
3
4
Date:
Time:
Reporter:
25.11.86
2.15
PMS
-
5 pm
I think that the Committee is concerned about even though there is review, whether you are going to implement that review on the fee
charged to senior secondary school students or not. As I understand, you are going to review the fees annually now.
1 2 3
2
3
4
5
5
6
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
SEM:
Yes, it is our intention.
I mean, there
7
are already agreed increases covering the next few years and we are about to open meetings to agree on principles for further increases thereafter which probably would bring fees back to something like their historical levels.
8
9
10
11
12
CHAIRMAN:
Yes.
13
14
MR CHEONG:
The 1986 increases, what is the level of
15
MR CHEONG:
15 increases in comparison to before?
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
D of E:
The 1986 increases were a phased increase over five year period to recover the cost way back in '78. In other words it was simply to recover the cost of the fees set in 1978. future of course we have to work out a basis for subsequent revisions as to what percentage of cost we should cover.
Well, accepting that what you have just
16
17
18
19
In
20
21
22
25
26
24 said, that both the Branch and the Department has not really overlooked the 1978 policy and the guidelines laid down therein, there was the guideline of recovering anywhere between 10 to 15% of cost of operation Is that the same policy objective that the future revision of fees is going to follow, according to that particular policy guideline?
27
28
29
SEM:
We have yet to agree the actual guideline in detail. I mean so far we only have a decision to restore the historical level in 1978 but I would expect that we will end up with
25
23
24
2 2 2 2 2 2
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
30
31
32
33
33
34
34
35
are going to have a meeting to discuss this on the 2nd December and we don't know yet what we will end up with.
35
36
a principle for a fee somewhere in the range we are speaking about. But we
36
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.