TNAG-1418-FCO40-1901-Hong-Kong-Parliamentary-Sub-Committee-on-Race-Relations-and--1985 — Page 113

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

RESTRICTED

aw

mo Logline 715

Ма

Mr Galsworthy /

HKD

MKK 243/2.

RECEIVED IN REGISTRY

07 MAY 1985

DESK OFFICER INDEX

75

From:

P Lever

United Nations Dept

Date:

3 May 1985

BELMARYCC:

PA

action Taken

Mr Hartland-Swann,

SEAD

aw

CALL BY UNHCR REPRESENTATIVE IN LONDON:

HONG KONG REFUGEES

1. I took the opportunity of a call on me yesterday by Mr von Arnim, the UNHCR representative in London, to raise the points made in the attached copy of the briefing which your Department was kind enough to prepare on Vietnamese refugees in Hong Kong.

2. As regards the closed camps, Mr von Arnim said that he recognised the strong feelings held in Hong Kong. Nonetheless the UNHCR regarded their continued existence as a stain on the international conscience. They questioned whether the relatively small number of people involved really justified the imposition of such a draconian measure; and wondered in any event whether it was effective. Their impression was that the closed camp policy had not served as a significant disincentive in curbing new arrivals and that there would not therefore be any increase in arrivals if the camps were abolished. I told Mr von Arnim that nonetheless the strong resentment in Hong Kong about what was seen as privileged treatment for people who had no family connections with Hong Kong and whose principal motive in going there was a desire for economic betterment was a factor the Government was bound to take into account. I did not leave him with any impression that the policy was likely to be discontinued.

3. As regards the suggestion in the Scorri Report that the British Government should accept the resettlement in the UK of some 500 or so refugees with family connections, I told Mr von Arnim that, although no decision had yet been taken, officials were studying the idea carefully and were even looking at the possibility of a continuing programme of offtake. The key factor in the Government's decision would be an assessment of whether a gesture of this kind by the United Kingdom would serve as a catalyst to others to contribute to resolving the problem. Did the UNHCR have reason to believe that this would be the case? Mr von Arnim said that, even without having consulted his authorities in Geneva, he was sure that the answer was yes. Several countries,

RESTRICTED

/notably

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.