15.
Findings:
The employees tended to think that it would be troublesome
=
to claim the benefits from the scheme. 51.3% (N
considered it as troublesome while only 21.6% (N
convenient, the rest 27.1% (N 567) did not know.
=
1072) of all employees
450) considered it
The mean score on
the convenient
ww
•
troublesome scale was 3.441 which was towards the
troublesome end of the scale. (Table 0119)
A
Estimated public support
Question 34. How much do you think will be the public support for this type
of scheme? (Prompt)
(1)
A great majority support.
(2)
A majority support.
(3) Don't know.
(4)
A minority support.
(5)
A small minority support.
Findings:
Most employees (71.2%, N
=
1488) estimated that there would be
a majority support for the scheme, while only 13.1% (N 274) said there
would be a minority support. The mean score on the majority support
minority support scale was 2.28 showing that the perceived level of support
was towards the majority end. (Table 0120)
60
16.
Extent of protection provided for employees in lower income groups
More percentage of the higher income bracket held life insurance
Very few of the low income bracket were protected. The tendency
was very marked. (Table 0135)
policies.
The employers tended to buy life insurance for the employees
with higher income and to neglect those with low income. This tendency was
very marked. (Table 0136)
Very few daily-rated and piece-rated workers had life insurance
bought by the employers. The monthly-paid workers were more protected
in this aspect. (Table 0139)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.