227
340
Gi
A.
2.
:
-204.
And his knowledge of this document would have been acquired in normal performance of his duties as a police officer? Correct.
It may be no record now exists of this document purely
because it was secret?
I can't comment. I do not know.
But you have diligently made inquiries and searched for
this document without success?
..
$
f..
Yes.
A.
ત
2.
A.
Go
A.
&
A.
&
A.
Is it correct that there was also a letter of complaint eventually passed on to Police Force concerning Lau Cheong Wa and a possible connection with Ng Sik Ho?
There was a letter and that letter is contained in-a file
which exists.
Are you aware of date of that lotter?
No.
If a memo is circulated to officers of a certain rank
concerning a matter of this nature would that memo also
be circulated to officers of ICAC of equivalent rank? It certainly would have been when Anti-corruption office
was part of Police Force at which time it was headed by
Assistant Commissioner of Police.
Is it correct that when officers of Police Force were
seconded to ICAC that they retain their police rank?
Yes. They did and still do.
And therefore if on distribution list, superintendent and
above, there were police officers holding that rank or
higher rank seconded to ICAC this memo would be known to
them?
"
Type of memo of which we are speaking on a need to know"
basis, all officers of a particular rank would not have
seen it
it would only be sent to those who are concerned.
Cross-examined by Mr. Gunston:
A.
You told us that there is a letter concerning complaint
against Lem Cheong Wa and Ng Sik Ho. Is that file
confidential or secret file?
Confidential.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.