ent mention Stone atters
hor
anything
abour "possessing in perpnity " of. ihale III of the Treaty of Nanking. I ned
be interested to see
a
legal interpretation
of the Convention of Peking, Article IT if one has been made. Presumably they ared
argue
Hng Kong Island is
Har so
Ing
aur colmy
Love
a
right
as its defendency. But I have
than there
may
to "Conilor"""
a
Jehing
Lave been an agreement
subsequent of the Convention of Peking which clarified the matter
Niome of this
cept in
so for
as
is at all urgent, ex-
I still hanker after
the elimination of HK revan a small bit If it - before I leave & the latter how looks feasible close. Again if you beant so quick abt. providing for my
lov
out
request.
had
the next one and not have
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.