ent mention Stone atters
hor
anything
abour "possessing in perpnity " of. ihale III of the Treaty of Nanking. I ned
be interested to see
a
legal interpretation
of the Convention of Peking, Article IT if one has been made. Presumably they ared
argue
Hng Kong Island is
Har so
Ing
aur colmy
Love
a
right
as its defendency. But I have
than there
may
to "Conilor"""
a
Jehing
Lave been an agreement
subsequent of the Convention of Peking which clarified the matter
Niome of this
cept in
so for
as
is at all urgent, ex-
I still hanker after
the elimination of HK revan a small bit If it - before I leave & the latter how looks feasible close. Again if you beant so quick abt. providing for my
lov
out
request.
had
the next one and not have