TNAG-0192-FCO40-228-Criminal-procedure-ordinance-discussions-1969 — Page 66

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

quite another matter to confer such a power on a district

judge, and more so on a magistrate who may only have a

few years practice and experience. Moreover, the new

section 122 appears to confer powers, both on the

Supreme Court and on subordinate courts, wider than the

inherent powers of the Supreme Court.

3. Another objection to the new section 122 is that if, as the Attorney General states in his Legal Report, the court is not sitting in camera, then it is objection- able in principle that a law-abiding member of the public should

may have to obtain permission from a public officer, to

whom the power has been delegated by the judge or

magistrate, as the case may be, in order to present in

"an open court".

Criticism

4. The new section 123. Much of the above applies

equally to the new section 123. A judge of the

Supreme Court in Hong Kong has wide inherent powers to

order part of a case to be heard in camera; whereas judges and magistrates of subordinate courts have only

statutory powers, in specific cases, to do so. It is very questionable whether judges or magistrates of

subordinate courts should have conferred upon them by

statute these wide inherent powers of a judge of the

Supreme Court.

5. Both of the new sections 122 and 123 would enable al

members of the public to be excluded from the court

while the decision of the court in the case was being

announced. The conferring of such a power, is, as far

as we know, unprecedented in the British system of law dentally it is also contrary to the principle of Article 6 (1) of

departs from

the European Convention for the Protection of Human

Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Command 8969), which was ratified by the United Kingdom Government in 1951.)

6. In the circumstances described above, it is

necessary to ask you to arrange for the enactment of a

further amending Ordinance. It is considered that the amending Ordinance should: -

(a) deal with the point raised in para. 5 above

by making it clear that the powers conferred

by the new sections 122 and 123 do not extend

to the clearing of the court whilst the

decision of the court is being announced; (b) provide that the new sections 122 and 123 would be in force only when so ordered by

/the Governor

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.