TNAG-0192-FCO40-228-Criminal-procedure-ordinance-discussions-1969 — Page 65

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

W(B)L 51-7433

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Registry HKK 149

No.

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret.

Confidential,

Restricted,

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

CONFIDENTIAL

DRAFT

Saving Despatch

Type 1+5

To:-

From

0.A.G.,

Hong Kong

No 663

Dalid 22 Novembe ich

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

Mr Smil

Mr. Gaminara

Mr. Carter

In Confidence

13

Sir Arthur Grattan-

D

Bellew

Your Despatch No. 1279 of 1 October.

Criminal Procedure (Amendment)

(No. 2) Ordinance 1968.

Although it is not proposed to recommend the

withholding of notification of Her Majesty's non- disallowance of this Ordinance (notification is being conveyed to you by formal despatch), the two new sections

which it adds to the principal Ordinance depart in

certain respects from fundamental principles inherent

in the British system of justice. Further amending

legislation as indicated below will therefore be required

to restore the situation.

2.

The new section 122. The inveterate rule is that

justice shall be administered in open court apart from

cases of "parental jurisdiction" and powers conferred

by statute. The Supreme Court of Hong Kong has,

however, very wide inherent powers of clearing the court and of punishing for contempt(including contemptuous

interference with judicial proceedings whether in the

court itself or in the precincts of the court) not only in

respect of itself but also in respect of courts subordin-

ate to it. A district judge or a magistrate in Hong

Kong has no such inherent powers. Such powers as they

normally have to deal with contempt are conferred on them

by statute and we are not aware of any British territory

in which the very wide discretion inherent in the

Supreme Court as regards clearing the court and punishing

contempt has been conferred as part of the permanent

law by statute on a judge or a magistrate of a subordinate

court. Although in times of emergency the conferring

of such extensive powers on subordinate courts may be

justified, it is very questionable whether there is

sufficient justification for doing this in normal times,

even in the special circumstances of Hong Kong. It is

one matter for a Supreme Court Judge to have the power

to exercise this wide discretion, he having had many

years of experience in the practice of the law, but it is

/quite another

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.