TNAG-0136-FCO40-172-Tariff-preferences-for-developing-countries-1970 — Page 32

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

RESTRICTED

Their

not be, as the situation of every country in the Community had

to be taken into account. There could then be safeguards

invoked on dozens and dozens of tariff positions.

present offer was, however, a generous one. The average

ceiling was double present imports from LDCs but in some cases it

was three, five or even ten times higher. A common scheme could

lead to different results in different countries and different

applications of safeguards could lead to trade deflections.

Doing away with existing preferences could affect the position of

certain poor African countries, most of whose exports would not

be covered by the generalised system. So special preferences

could not be withdrawn.

He also claimed that reverse preferences

had been "accepted by GATT". In any case each Yaoundé Convention

associate was now free to withdraw preferences given to the

Community if it so wished.

14. The Nordic Countries (de Geer, Sweden) expressed relief at

the news of the U.S. offer and said that there were similarities

in the Nordic and U.S. positions. Their scheme tabled on 1st

March was a good basis for generalised preferences and one of

their main concerns was to arrive at a mutually acceptable common

scheme. In an obvious reference to the EEC position he said that

the Nordic delegations could not accept that a change in position

was neither politically nor technically possible. They were in

favour of giving the maximum information to UNCTAD which should

make it clear to the LDCs that the OECD countries needed more time

to negotiate among themselves.

15. Belgium (Forthomme) intervened next to make it clear that

his government had never accepted the Special Group Report.

The very late tabling of the U.S. offer had made consultations more

difficult. The EEC offer, on the other hand, had been made on

time and he agreed with everything di Martino said in his inter-

vention. He would add that the structure of the EEC offer was not

Most of it was in the first report of the Special Group.

new.

RESTRICTED

/What was

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.