CO537-4998 — Page 23

aw,

is not being done separately in Mr./Morris's Department)?

One further point. The conclusion in No. 21 is, I gather from what passed at the meeting of the Vice-Chiefs- of-Staff, not in accord with the Vice-Chiefs' views, and a copy of this should clearly be brought to their notice, I think, in case they wish to make any further comments.

IBS

Mr. Morgan

17.2.1949.

I submit two drafts:-

It. Cd Waterfield conveying the

(a) to Lt.Cd

conclusion at paragraph 2 of No 21

(DRAFT A)

to the

Chiefs of Staff

1

(b) to Hong Kong

as at x

Mr.

Tidebotham's minute

+

17/2 above. (Draft

The senes of Minutes flagged 'A'

should be registered

and

hara

3

q No 21

Эправлёт парено

as requested in

M. s. a.

Morris's muite of

1572

JAHamis

18/2.

J.Gh8/18/2/44.

Nothing has

gme

separates from

Suhtles Debt. about the wrai .

Seb- $Titel Boff

www.m

1872

~ then quickly the harjan baranger for Dishalets of off A.

!!!!

19/2 ali