aw,
is not being done separately in Mr./Morris's Department)?
One further point. The conclusion in No. 21 is, I gather from what passed at the meeting of the Vice-Chiefs- of-Staff, not in accord with the Vice-Chiefs' views, and a copy of this should clearly be brought to their notice, I think, in case they wish to make any further comments.
IBS
Mr. Morgan
17.2.1949.
I submit two drafts:-
It. Cd Waterfield conveying the
(a) to Lt.Cd
conclusion at paragraph 2 of No 21
(DRAFT A)
to the
Chiefs of Staff
1
(b) to Hong Kong
as at x
Mr.
Tidebotham's minute
+
17/2 above. (Draft
The senes of Minutes flagged 'A'
should be registered
and
hara
3
q No 21
Эправлёт парено
as requested in
M. s. a.
Morris's muite of
1572
JAHamis
18/2.
J.Gh8/18/2/44.
Nothing has
gme
separates from
Suhtles Debt. about the wrai .
Seb- $Titel Boff
www.m
1872
~ then quickly the harjan baranger for Dishalets of off A.
!!!!
19/2 ali