CO537-3702 — Page 18

hu Rees-Williams

Sir C. Jeffries.

I think Mr. Wallace is right. Any more precise statement than that made by Mr. Mayhew, see at end of No. 15 on this file, will require very careful consideration in the light of whatever reply we receive to No. 21. We certainly are not in a position at the moment I think to press for anything more

than what is suggested by the Foreign Office, see X of Mr. Wallace's minute. may wish to submit to higher authority for

But you

DŽEM CUNTEKER,

7

13.i.49.

I apree 6.8.8 13/1

ари в

as this is a co

as well as an

70 maller I kind

his note at- X

Alcould allude to this statement on

the 7 Iuly at well at on

y

December &

the 10

should refer to tie

dalis. The note at present ind too

Vague

2.

I bebere ke 70 is being

rather havorand about kiig maker.

a fairly bold statement will

do nothing but good.

<

but-good

After 14/1

at once

With th. Sirkelsthan's grement I

passed the gist of the above,

& M. Scarlett Zo.

the note, fu

and in particular asked that h

statement shamer

сыл Наполесной

include reference

Williams' Hatement

M. Meghan's Helement of

f the datas

with cames.

Mr. Scarlett took whe

Part

y

17 July

10 Dec

1

the

h.

14/1

A

& Dr. Ravens

سی

& should refer