hu Rees-Williams
Sir C. Jeffries.
I think Mr. Wallace is right. Any more precise statement than that made by Mr. Mayhew, see at end of No. 15 on this file, will require very careful consideration in the light of whatever reply we receive to No. 21. We certainly are not in a position at the moment I think to press for anything more
than what is suggested by the Foreign Office, see X of Mr. Wallace's minute. may wish to submit to higher authority for
But you
DŽEM CUNTEKER,
7
13.i.49.
I apree 6.8.8 13/1
ари в
as this is a co
as well as an
70 maller I kind
his note at- X
Alcould allude to this statement on
the 7 Iuly at well at on
y
December &
the 10
should refer to tie
dalis. The note at present ind too
Vague
2.
I bebere ke 70 is being
rather havorand about kiig maker.
a fairly bold statement will
do nothing but good.
<
but-good
After 14/1
at once
With th. Sirkelsthan's grement I
passed the gist of the above,
& M. Scarlett Zo.
the note, fu
and in particular asked that h
statement shamer
сыл Наполесной
include reference
Williams' Hatement
M. Meghan's Helement of
f the datas
with cames.
Mr. Scarlett took whe
Part
y
17 July
10 Dec
1
the
h.
14/1
A
& Dr. Ravens
سی
& should refer