CO537-35 — Page 354

:

whether

2

Se 3. Hope

0:-

205.

345-

351 Shawn dr.525

the fine was for Wei Yuk's property or not. He has a great

many shops besides that.

Are you aware that Mr Wei Yuk did not give any orders at all2234

either that property

for the property was not in his name

in Tank Lane or in Square Street - and do you know that it

was in the name of Mr Shelton Hooper, who did the whitewash-

-ing?

A: Yes, that is so this year,

1 med Q:- You say this was January or February ?

#235-

A: Well, I don't remember whether it was Wei Yuk's in the first

or second moon or not, I don't remember exactly.

Fung Wa Chun :-

You said you were prosecuted and fined ?

2 dp

36A:-

Ios.

22 3

36

274 QI-

27.

A;-

Who was the Inspector who looked after the limewashing? 2237

It was in Peel Street 56a, b, and o. I remember now, that

was it.

214808-

Who was the Inspector?

28.

2238

Mr Woodcock prosecuted me, Mr Reidie attended.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

19. C.O. 537

35 RECORD OFFICE, LONDON

OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE