:
whether
2
Se 3. Hope
0:-
205.
345-
351 Shawn dr.525
the fine was for Wei Yuk's property or not. He has a great
many shops besides that.
Are you aware that Mr Wei Yuk did not give any orders at all2234
either that property
for the property was not in his name
in Tank Lane or in Square Street - and do you know that it
was in the name of Mr Shelton Hooper, who did the whitewash-
-ing?
A: Yes, that is so this year,
1 med Q:- You say this was January or February ?
#235-
A: Well, I don't remember whether it was Wei Yuk's in the first
or second moon or not, I don't remember exactly.
Fung Wa Chun :-
You said you were prosecuted and fined ?
2 dp
36A:-
Ios.
22 3
36
274 QI-
27.
A;-
Who was the Inspector who looked after the limewashing? 2237
It was in Peel Street 56a, b, and o. I remember now, that
was it.
214808-
Who was the Inspector?
28.
2238
Mr Woodcock prosecuted me, Mr Reidie attended.
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
19. C.O. 537
35 RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE