CO537-35 — Page 353

344

350

Shan. in. Se

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

Pung Wa Chun 2- No entry in the books ?

25

2

Bim No.

2225

Shelton Hooper:- Was the summons made out in your name – against you ? 2716

ba:- No, It is made out in the owners name. If you are the owner

22 12200

27

$3.

22 m ૧૧

The Chairman 3-

2244

you give it to me to go up to the Court.

Just now you said you had been fined and I asked you if the 227

owner had been fined and you said No ?

But you see it is this; The owner is unwilling to go to the

Court.

But the owner is summonsed and we can issue a warrant if we 1:18

wish to ?

Well if there is 100 cases of whitewashing there is 100

whitewashers that go to the Court.

You say have been fined ? 29A1- 105.

Did you go yourself to the Magistracy?

As- The foki went up and I went to see..

224

30

22

2

Q:

And did the Magistrate fine the foki ?

A:-

He did and I paid the money.

2229

2130

2231

35

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

2243 08- If the property belonged to Wei Isk or somebody else and the 2732

32

omer of the property was summonsed for limewashing, Why did

you send your foki and why did you pay the fine? That had

you got to do with that ?

Az- Well, I did the work for hin every year so that there is no

need to give me directions about it and, if it is not proper

it is I should have to be fined.

Shelton Hooperi- If you do the work for Hr Tei Tuk every year can't you tell 223 b

22 ph

33.

us the situation of the property 7

Some of his is in Square Street, some in Tank Lane, mome are

21, 28, 25 and 87 Wanchai Road, but I don't remember whether

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE