CO537-(36-37) — Page 235

Wn's Arque

A.

169244

As

Yes.

2090.

Mr Christian sokk

1113

16924

Then, ne drains being shown thereon, dont you know that

he could not have done without a certificate from the

Sanitary Board that the other part had been complied

with

Yes.

Then what is the value of the advics you have get, 16925

that the swer might presume that the home ma in order

That all the work shem on the plan was in order, yes.

But you were not advised that the occupant could oččígy

a house,

if he built it in accordance with that,

and

left out all his' draina ↑

16926

26 Re

As a matter of fact, the poigt did not arise.

Clearly it arises.

16927

A.

It did not arise in this case, that I have submitted,

+628

28

૧.

But I take it, it did arise in a general case, not în a

specific asse ?

A.

Yes, but there ma a specific case,

29

Q.

Then it did not apply in a oase like this ?

16949

A.

I should think it would.

16930

34 4

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

If it applied in a oɛse like this, and you had passed

those plans without any drainage shows, do you think the

owner could have occupied them without holding a

certifiesta from the Sanitary Board ↑

A

They were old houses.

16431

3/

32

But you do not pass the drainage plan. You had ne power,

and the Sanitary Surveyor is not a subordinate of yours,

and you have ne jurisdiction over him ↑

B.

Then what is the meaning of that injunction at the 16432

bottom of the notice, that these plans must be approved

by the Fuilding Authority, It does not carry it fur

enough.

Hot absolutely. Fo.

36

1

1

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH – NOT TO BE

Page 235Page 236

älit