Wn's Arque
A.
169244
As
Yes.
2090.
Mr Christian sokk
1113
16924
Then, ne drains being shown thereon, dont you know that
he could not have done without a certificate from the
Sanitary Board that the other part had been complied
with
Yes.
Then what is the value of the advics you have get, 16925
that the swer might presume that the home ma in order
That all the work shem on the plan was in order, yes.
But you were not advised that the occupant could oččígy
a house,
if he built it in accordance with that,
and
left out all his' draina ↑
16926
26 Re
As a matter of fact, the poigt did not arise.
Clearly it arises.
16927
A.
It did not arise in this case, that I have submitted,
+628
28
૧.
But I take it, it did arise in a general case, not în a
specific asse ?
A.
Yes, but there ma a specific case,
29
Q.
Then it did not apply in a oase like this ?
16949
A.
I should think it would.
16930
34 4
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
If it applied in a oɛse like this, and you had passed
those plans without any drainage shows, do you think the
owner could have occupied them without holding a
certifiesta from the Sanitary Board ↑
A
They were old houses.
16431
3/
32
But you do not pass the drainage plan. You had ne power,
and the Sanitary Surveyor is not a subordinate of yours,
and you have ne jurisdiction over him ↑
B.
Then what is the meaning of that injunction at the 16432
bottom of the notice, that these plans must be approved
by the Fuilding Authority, It does not carry it fur
enough.
Hot absolutely. Fo.
36
1
1
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH – NOT TO BE
Page 235Page 236
älit