CO537-(36-37) — Page 197

One 5. Ampul

2053.

1075

Dr. askminent

addressed to the Board should be acknowledged through

the Secretary f

A.

Yes.

16663 9

It would be in order ?

1

64

A

16.663

Yes. I think they ought to pass through the Secretary,

and be transmitted through him to the officer

concerned.

16664

And a record of dates, as to receipt and acknowledge-

ment ↑

That is what should be done. At least, I ordered it to

be done some years ago. - You asked me to my the lant

time I was here whether it was not a fast that you

(addressing Mr Lam Câu Pak) the Capraia Superinkand

of Police, and myself, were appointed a Commā 1:6

(Quotes from evidence). I have been all through the

minutes, and I cannot find any such Committee appointed,

but what yt hink you were referring to is this: There

was a committee appointed on the 24th June 1902, te

oonsider the joint report of Professer gimpann and Mr

Chadwick.

Yr Lau Chu Pakt-

That might be it.

16.665

The Chairman 1 –

61-

Who were the Members of that Committee, Dr AtkinNDA,

have you got their names there ?

A

Mr Lau Chu Pak!-

The President, Colonel Hughes, and in Kan

colonel Hughes did not serve. I think ar

16.666

66

The Chairman 1 -

s orved in his plass.

mere is nothing to shew that, and when the sinsrity

report was submitted, Colamel Hughes seconded, so he

must have been there.

At the same time, wo anksɗ you • I thi à it to a

question put by myself or är Hooper,

•

16.667

made any witten report to the Government, with regard

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

། །

Reference:-

www.C.O. 537

NOT TO BE

COPYRIGHT PRONAJESTANTLY MI

REPRODUCED

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC

MITH-