One 5. Ampul
2053.
1075
Dr. askminent
addressed to the Board should be acknowledged through
the Secretary f
A.
Yes.
16663 9
It would be in order ?
1
64
A
16.663
Yes. I think they ought to pass through the Secretary,
and be transmitted through him to the officer
concerned.
16664
And a record of dates, as to receipt and acknowledge-
ment ↑
That is what should be done. At least, I ordered it to
be done some years ago. - You asked me to my the lant
time I was here whether it was not a fast that you
(addressing Mr Lam Câu Pak) the Capraia Superinkand
of Police, and myself, were appointed a Commā 1:6
(Quotes from evidence). I have been all through the
minutes, and I cannot find any such Committee appointed,
but what yt hink you were referring to is this: There
was a committee appointed on the 24th June 1902, te
oonsider the joint report of Professer gimpann and Mr
Chadwick.
Yr Lau Chu Pakt-
That might be it.
16.665
The Chairman 1 –
61-
Who were the Members of that Committee, Dr AtkinNDA,
have you got their names there ?
A
Mr Lau Chu Pak!-
The President, Colonel Hughes, and in Kan
colonel Hughes did not serve. I think ar
16.666
66
The Chairman 1 -
s orved in his plass.
mere is nothing to shew that, and when the sinsrity
report was submitted, Colamel Hughes seconded, so he
must have been there.
At the same time, wo anksɗ you • I thi à it to a
question put by myself or är Hooper,
•
16.667
made any witten report to the Government, with regard
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
། །
Reference:-
www.C.O. 537
NOT TO BE
COPYRIGHT PRONAJESTANTLY MI
REPRODUCED
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
MITH-