PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:
m...............im CO. 882
84
POSTSCRIPT.
The following figures relating to the train mileage and details of coaching traffic on the Ceylon railways for 1884, furnished by the general manager of the railway, having reached me too late to be inserted in their proper places in the above memorandum, they are now forwarded; for, as rendering the comparison and analysis therein attempted more complete, they may be of interest :-
Sections.
Colombo to Kandy
Pérádeniya to Nawalapitiya
Nawalapitiya to Tulawakélé
Kandy to Mátalé -
Colombo to Kalutara
Total
DETAILS of Train Mileage for 1884.
Passenger
Mixed
Goods
Total
train miles.
train miles.
train miles.
train miles.
61,182
68,048
181,293
310,523
63,179
12,687
75,866
28,532
4,003
32,535
38,478
38,478
152,796
152,796
213,078
198,237
197,983
610,198
TABLE showing Number of Passengers carried, Receipts from each Class. Average payment by each Passenger per mile, and the average distance cach Passenger was carried.
85
3. The total mileage of passengers expressed in the number of passengers carried one mile is :-
First class passengers
Second class
Third class
do. do.
Total passenger miles
-
-
1,117,012 1,395,681
·
26,638,424
29,151,117
giving an average distance travelled by each of the 2,111,334 passengers conveyed of 13.80 miles. Comparing these figures with the similar ones relating to the Darjeeling railway, as given in Table No. I., it will be noted that, although upon the Ceylon railwaye generally, which in 1884 were three times the length of the Darjeeling line, nearly 68 times as many passengers were conveyed as upon the latter line, yet the total mileage travelled by these passengers was only 29 times that travelled by the passengers on the Darjeeling railway, confirming most strongly the observations made in paragraph 10 of the memorandum as to the generally very short distances travelled by passengers on the Ceylon railways.
F. J. WARING,
Chief Resident Engineer.
Railway Extension Office, Dimbula, Kotagala, 21st April 1886.
(Signed)
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
ALLY WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE BE REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHIC- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPHNOT TO
бу
First class
Second clas Third class
Total
Number
of passengers carried.
Receipts from passengers carried.
Average payment by each passenger per mile.
Average distance each passenger was
carried.
Rs.
Cents.
Miles.
49,491 121,681 1,910,162
76,352 69,800 665,873
71 5,
22.57
11:47
13.73
2,111,334
812,025
The total coaching receipts being Rs. 916,878, while the passenger train miles were 213,978, the coaching receipts per passenger train mile were Rs. 4.2849.
14
2. On analysing the figures given in the second table in the column headed "Average payment by each passenger per mile," I make some slight differences from those given by the general manager. By my calculations these figures are as follows :—
First class average payment per mile
Second class
Third class
do. do.
For passengers of all classes the average payment per mile is
-
Rs. 0.0684
99
0'05001
"
0.02499 0.02786
This latter sum is, it will be observed, less than one-fourth of Rs. 1155, the average sum received on the Darjeeling Railway for carrying one passenger one mile. (Sce Table IV., progressive number 30.) The figures for first, second, and third class passengers just given are, it will be noted, lower than the first, second, and third This is probably class fares per mile on the railway generally, as given in Table No. I.
due to the issue of return tickets at generally one-and-a-half single fares, and to the low scale of charges on the Seacoast line, where, taking the fares from Kalutara South to the Fort Station (26 miles) as a basis for calculation, they are :-*
First class Second class Third class
mile.
Rs. 0.0673
per
31
0.0431 do.
0.0204 do.
"
Again, the general manager of the railway, by crediting the passenger train mileage run with the whole of the coaching receipts, obtains the very favourable result of Rs. 4.28 19 per passenger train mile: bnt as some of the coaching receipts must have been derived from the mixed trains, the mileage of which is given at 198,237 miles, this would not appear to be the propave been only credited with the receipts froin purely way of looking at the question, and the passenger train mileage should, passenger trains.
think,
No. 6.
The RIGHT HON. THE EARL GRANVILLE, K.G., to GOVERNOR THE HON. SIR A. H. GORDON, G.C.M.G. No. 207.
SIR,
Downing Street, August 3, 1886. WITH reference to my predecessor's Despatch, No. 153, of 28th October 1885,* relating to proposed railway extension in Uva, I have the honour to forward for your consideration the enclosed summary of the speeches made by members of a deputation which waited upon me on the 1st of June last, to urge the adoption of a narrow gauge line for the district in question, and also a copy of a letter from Mr. Ramanathan on the subject, enclosing copy of a memorial from the Ceylon Agricultural Association, dated 27th February last.
I have not sent an act of the representations made by this deputation sooner, because I have been expecting despatches from you dealing with the question.
I have now received your despatches of the numbers and dates in the margint forwarding the report of the commission and stating your views on the subject of the proposed railway extension.
These despatches will receive very careful consideration, and in due course my successor will address you on the whole subject.
Sir A. Gordon.
Enclosure 1 in No. 6.
REPORT OF DEPUTATION.
(Signed)
I have, &c.
GRANVILLE.
On the 1st of June 1886 a deputation of the following gentlemen waited on Lord Granville to urge on him the expediency of an immediate inquiry as to the suitability of the Darjeeling railroad system to the uphill country of Ceylon, and to the extension into Uvah.
Sir William Gregory introduced the deputation, consisting of Mr. J. White, late Member of Legislative Council, representing Messrs. Baring Brothers; Mr. Bois, representing Messrs. Murray Robertson; Mr. T. Brown, Chairman of Uvah Company: Major Murray, owner of estates in Uvah; the Hon. Mr. Rama Nathan, and Mr. Dornbust.
Lord Granville, being indisposed, was represented by the Under Secretary for the Colonies, Sir Robert Herbert, and Mr. Meade.
• No. 2.
¡ 33993.
↑ Nos. 25, 268, 259, 28rd June (Nos. 3, 4, and 5).
N