1744.
blin
Ymdde
14669 8.
in the writing.
760
had signed it ?
An Inspector might get the clerk to alter it after you
14669
70 Q.
Certainly, he might, if he was in collusion with the Jierk.
That form is merely printed as a matter of convenience,
14670 to save time, so you have them printed with blanks to be filled in. That is practically a letter. Did it ever 'coour to you that it would be a proper thing to initial any alteration, which might appear, Suppoeing,' as Mr Humphreys has suggested, the words "make good" had been altered to "reconcrete; aid it not coour to
you that you should have initiall that alteration wa
well as signing the letter at the bottom ?
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
A.
It did not occur to me.
Have you ever seen such a thing dɔne ?
14671
A.
Many times.
12.2.
But it aid not bucur to you "ha' you cught to have
14672
some such system in your own offics ?
A.
73 Q.
No, it did not ecour to me.
You did not addyt it, althougı you were aware of it • 14673
A.
No.
74 Q.
You have seen it in other peoples letters ?
14674
A.
P: Snelton Hooper:-
가
A.
76 Q
I have seen it, but where I have seen it I coula not
say.
Is it not a part of your duty, me Secretary, in sending
these or other notices, to see that the notice conforms to the hw, mi.. that you don't send anything illegal ↑
That is so.
If any of these notices - approved of by the Board, and their actual wording taken from the Ordinance, and pút
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Į