CO537-36 — Page 585

صا

"

вые Настировали 10

A.

146638.

A

64 Q.

1743.

elterød in. any way ↑

After he has signed them ?

759

No, before you sign them. Does it ever happen that 14663

the usual printing in a notics such as that which is

checked by Mr Oarter is struck out, or altered, in Mr

Carter's handwriting

Yes, I have seen it done in Mr Carter's handwriting

recently.

But it is sometimes altered, before it is signed by 14664

you ?

Not so much now since these notices were revised.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

יוון יוון ודור

Reference:-

C.O. 537

A.

65 20

Just answer the question, please. It is sometimes

altered before it is signed by you?

14665

I should say no at present, except by Mr Carter.

36

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE

A.

660.

ine Chairman:-

Humphrey®:-

A.

by Ro

Chairman:-

6B

A.

A.

Well, if it is altered after you sign it, it must be a 14666

forgery then .

Put the question a little more clearly please.

It sometides happens that notices are received by

houseowners, in which this printing "make good" in

struck out, and "reconarete" is put in. Is that

altered before you sign it, or after you sign it ?

Always before I sign it. If there is any alteration to

make, it is altered before I sign it.

14667

Bỏ you mean to tell me it has never happened that a

notice which you have aigned has not ben altered after

you have signed it ?

Not to my knowledge.

But it might be, without your knowledge, Mr Woodoook. 14667

You could not remember whether it was altered before

or after you signed it.

The only way would be the difference in writing. If it

was altered by an Inspector, there would be a difference

Page 585Page 586