882
1
ما
痔
Clearman.
A.
13447 Q.
1575.
589 & Peurse el
I dont know that I have seen the original 0. S. Os. I
may have.
13.447 There is a note by the Registrar General, to the effect,
who was it that recommended the Carbolosone. Was it
Inspector Reidie &c. &o. What I want is, I understand
that amongst your copies, of the papers, we probably
would find a memorandum from Dr Clark, or Inspector
Reidie, bearing on the subject.
There is one there, Sir, I think I can point it out to
A.
you.
48
Q.
How do you file your papers?
13448
A.
It was to do with the Secretary
-
not with me.
44 Q.
Dont you index them
·
they are not numbered.
13.449
A.
They have to keep an index of some kind.
V
There does this thing begin, then?
13450
A.
(Points out the beginning). C. 5. 0. 1010 of 1902.
13451
Q.
A
What position did Dr Clark hold in 1902. Was he M. 0. H?
Medical Officer of Health.
A.
13.45 2
I see that at that time Jeyes Fluid was quoted at
$1.66 per gallon, and Carbolosene at $2 per gallon. That
is a difference of 34 cents, which as the Registrar
General points out is a very considerable percentage
Cost nearly 30 per cent more. The ease of Carbologene was
ensta nearly 30 per cent more than the oksa of Jeyes Fluid ?
Yes.
laid dow
The price here, or the price the Goverment have to 13453
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH-
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
pay ?
F
A.
4 Q.
A.
I think these are the prices actually paid.
Allowing for everything, the Crown agents and so on
Carbolosene was purchased locally.
13454
55 Q
Yes, but Jeyes Fluid was from home.
13458-
Ir Shelton Hooper:-
Is not Jeyes Fluid purchased locally from W. G.
Humphreys and Company ↑