י
107.
But, hunderch is
291
As- They are not in his hands entirely because the amount suppli
-ed in checked by the Inspector and none of my clerks could
alter the signature in any way.
Lau Chu Paki 1757
Are these Contractors put forward by any Officers of the
Por Sastance the man Sam Iu, what was Sanitary Department ?
1755
he before he became a contractor 7
I can't say from mesory. Before he became a Contractor be may have been a poolie or in sous other fairly low positios.
691- He was a scavenging coulie wasn't he ?
1756
Atm
I cannot say. I know he did not have a very good position.
The Chair -
Cha11717
You don't know that he wa; u spavenging coulie ?
1757
A2%
I cannot Bay,
58 9:-
Would you be surprised to ligur he 415 ?..
1758
12-
1759
48-
A3-
1760 17-
I cannot say he was from memory.
The point Nr Lau asked was whether thi: ban was put forward 1759
or recommended by anyone in the Sanitary Department ?
I cannot day at present, ithout Incking up the records.
Could you, by looking up your records, find out the previous 10 history of these varinus Contractors and if they were recn
-rended to the Government by any employees of the Sanitary Department ? Is such information kept on recort do you think
It might be in connecüion vill our first contrac's. 1 can
A3-
1. agine a cave when a man first comes. I usually my self go
if I can kather doma to the Registra» General and find out
the man is of good standing. It is possible that
Trash tes www
may have b spermended by korte mon of the
Department. If my soning wore a correclt,, this man Se
I was reqommended by Inspectie Reidis. I am spỏ thing from
9.in
B
Shelton Hongri
pet» Would the radarumbullion bộ 15 wedding er vorħal ↑
spoken to Dr Că val shout the matter w
Re
Aav
nlır
he may
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
mm
Reference:-
C.O. 537
35
REPRODUCED RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC O PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH NOT TO BE