.

now

205.

209

The Witness

that they are in Chinese

That is a mistake that anybody

might make. Your original answer stands but if it is abso-

-lutely incorrect you have the power to alter it at the next

meeting.

:-- That is what I intended to do. The answer was a directly

opposite one. The question was a very long one and my idea

in altering the answer was because otherwise the following

evidence is contradictory.

The Chairman i-

You can't correct the answer in the notes of the previous

meeting. You can merely ask power to make a fresh statement. Hur are Shelton Hooper:- It ia nerely clerical corrections that are allowed.

The Chairman i-

Fitness :=

The Chairman i--

I thought it necessary to point out to you that you weaken

pabus Toler your evidence by asking such alterations.

A

The only idea I had in wishing to alter then was to give the

Commission a better idea of the matter.

All that we understand. We don't wish to impute any motive

to you. In a Court of Law you would not be allowed to do so

and if you were cross examined you would find yourself in

very great difficulties if you wished to correct your

answers in that way My idea was to go on with the examina-

-tion of Mr Woodcock with regard to the Standing Orders but

I think if he wishes to make various corrections we had

better take that first. It is open to you Hr Woodcock to

point out what corrections you wish to make.

ir Skelton Hooper:- Any answers that you wish to give that will convey a dif-

-ferent meaning.

The Chairman im

For instancethis question of the Bills, Where you say they were sent in in English and you say now that they were sent

in in Chinese.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

HC.O. 537

35

OUT PERMISSION OF THE

REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH – NOT TO BE

RECORD OFFICE,

LONDON

Page 210Page 211

Share This Page