es
(
مر
:
2400.
Mr Chav Sun the
280
feet at the lower part that is closed up.
-
But it would not be open, the first six feet, 30 19.381
·
that a person could look in ?
Well, take the plain board partitions. They are only
Fr Shelton Hooper:-
19387
A.
about 8 or 9 feet high.
Mr Lau cha Pak:-
Not so high as that ?
19.382
8t
A.
I am not speaking of European feet.
Mr Fung Wa Chun:-
13
Dont you know the present Ordinance only allows a 19383
cubicle to be as high as six feet ↑
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
། 4། །
muminum
Reference:-
GO. 537
37
REPRODUCED COPYRIGHT
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
A.
I did not know that.
Ju Q.
Fr Lau chu Pak:
vr Fung Wa Chun:-
¿
The Chairman :-
A.
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
83-
A.
I tell you it is six feet.
Even under the old Ordinance, it has never been any
higher than 8 feet English, not Chinese.
19384
Under the old Ordinance, if you have three cubicles on
one floor, you can only have six feet. Two cubicles,
seven feet, Three cubicles, six feet, and the present
Ordinance six feet all round.
But I take it six feet 'would be quite nuitable for
ordinary purposes? It would give you all the privacy
you want, and at the same time, light and air from the
top.
Well, the ordinary people would use plank partitions, sik feet high, but then people with any means, we Chinese, like to have the house look nice, and we use
door partitions.
But you are talking of the $50 man, not the wealthy 19385
class for the moment.
But they would like to use the door partitions. When they come to move, they can take all those doors out,
and take than a way with them, and if they rent another
place, they can put them up there,
Are not those doors moveable ?
Mr Lau chu Puk:-
A..
You
yr Humphreys!»
19386
19397
We are not talking of what kind of partitions. What the Chairman asked if whether six feet would be sufficient?
30 ·