LAS
:
Анальный
A.
1895490
A.
234+..
2347
St. Clethrom
226
such similar partitions should be made practically fira proof, like a fire proof wall ↑
No,
I would not say fire proof, but something reasonably
fire rasiat ing.
Not like a fire proof wall that you build
No.
18454
You dont insist on having partitions of the strength 8
53-9.
a fire proof wall ?
A.
No.
vr Shelton 'Hooper:- Supposing there were no partitions at all, do you
56
A.
57°2
A.
ક -
A.
The Chairman:-
59
A.
OD A.
think it would be better?
78956
If there were no partitions at all, the question does
not arise.
↑ am speaking of those partitions in question. Do you 8757 thin, if they were not there at all, there would hə
greater safety in case of fire ?
I cant express it that way.
I want it, if you can answer that question, because 13958
you take up the ground, looking after the publio
interests, of having a place as fire proof as possible
to prevent d anger, and you have called upon them to pull this down. Now then, would that building be more
fire proof without this iron soreen, than with it?
No, it would not.
Would it be less fire resisting, without those screens
There would be less draught there.
Nd, I think it would make practically no differenne.
15760
But they would certainly not increase the danger to the
building, hy having them there ?
1.
A.
No, I dont think that they would.
61
Q.
But could they possibly,
good iron partitions,
18961
increase the danger ?
You see I dont confine my consideration to this one
A.
Mr Shelton Hooperi-
67
Case.
But I want to d sal with this case particularly ?
18962
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
GO. 537
37
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE