CO537-(36-37) — Page 504

as

7

1

برم

}

Які в наприм

234

18963

2348

hur Chittum end

227

A.

D.

I say, if I permit it here, then I must be prepared to

permit it universally throughout the City.

18963 Now, I put a general question to you. As the Building

Authority, you hare certain discretionary powers ?

A.

Yes,

.

A.

¿

I have.

18964 Now, dont you conceive it your duty in that connection

that you should not withhold that, except judicially,

and in the same way as the Ranitary Board, shen they

are applied te for exemption, should not withhold their

consent to modifications ↑ You must take each oase on

its merits. You have got that discretion, but you said

Just now "If I do it in this case, I must in others".

Yes.

18965

But dont you consider that you should take each case on

its merits ?

I quite agree with you on broad principles, to take a

case on its merits.

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

ག་

Reference:-

mmmmmmmGO. 537

RECORD OFFICE, OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - HOT TO BE

LONDON

660.0

I am not saying this would create a precedent,

not this case, but in any case.

- no

no 15966

A.

ریا

68

A.

A.

But you cant get away from the fact that it does

create a precedent,

Therefore that lays with you ?.

It does.

18967

Then, dont you think that all sumptions you are asked

for,

create a precedent ? If you are unked to maction

a building over and above the height allowed here, and

it has to meet with your approval, and you grant that,

dont you consider that creates a precedent ↑

Yea, it creates a precedent for any cases under

similar conditions. But of course the whole city is

composed of strings of houses divided from each other,

and these are exactly sivilar to heaps of other houses,

that exist as regards that portion of their construction

Q. Now, supposing this is a domestic house, and people 18969-

6990