16420
Clearan
A.
A.
2/
A.
A.
23
A.
Q.
A.
Q..
25.
2017.
1038
I think this section requires amendment,
16.420
That is the point: Whether in the working, the
abolition has been carried further than the Government
in that day,
intended.
I cant answer that question.
Do you think with regard to the total abolition of 16421
cubicles, the ordinance is extreme ✦
Yea.
And you think with advantage this section might be 16.422
modified ?
I do.
Without any detriment to the health of the Colony 9/6423
I certainly think that section 151 might be modified as
well,
- I think 150, 151, 153, and 154 all require
reconsideration.
*
16424
Are you prepared offhand to give us in brief what you think the amendment might be ?
No. I think the result of the practical working of this section's provisions is that they are too drastic as
they are.
I see 153 and 154 are practically new seotions, entirely inserted by ordinanes 23 ↑
A.
Уев.
Mr Lau ghu Pak:-
єв
16425
I think the framers of the Ordinance at the time i6426 thought that two cubicles would he allowed on each
fidor.
A.
YOR.
Mr Lau Chu Pak:-
Mr Shelton goopari-
27.
I think that was the idea at the time,
16.427
Dr Atkinson, with 1-gard to limewashing, it has beur suggested that it is not necessary to strictly enforce those provisions and Bye Laws, with regard to all ́ tenements in this Coloma, Bont you think yourself that the better class of houses, we will any take each
* |
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
Page 160Page 161