+
Mi stropit.
A.
Mr Shelton Hooper:-
The Chairman:-
16416
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH
COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE
RECORD OFFICE,
LONDON
2014.
1037
Druskini
Co
they have not been justified in being called upon to de, and when oases have been investigated by superior authority, it has been found that they have been unnecessarily called upon, and with a view of saving friction between the Department and the public, there would be more confidenos if they knew it had to be passed by a man with a good knowledge of building and building material.
+
Well, you cant expect Sanitary Inspectors to know. That is my idea.
16.416
Assuming that some such system be adopted, a good deal of work which is now done by the Secretary, and the various Inspectors, in the name of the Building Authority, would now be done in the name of the Sanitary
Department, and so you would have all the Junior Officers working for the one head, and not for two
heads, as they are at proseht.
That is 8O.
16.7.
So it appears to me, that would be another advantage'?
Yes.
Could you see any objection to some such system • 16418
I think it would be an improvement.
As you know, one of the greatest causes of complaint 164/9 which have been raised by the Chinese population against
the present Ordinance, has been the abolition of
cubiclep, which we must admit has caused a great deal of in convenience and expense to a large number of
people. As you understand the working of the Ordinance
now, do you think that in its working it has proved
moru зxtrame han var intended by the framers of the
Ordinance, 1 do you think this was the result they
intended t arrive at, the practical abolition of
albiclos ?
A.
7
Q.
A.
A.
#
Q.
19
>
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.