Chademain.
A.
No.
2013.
1034
Barkin
16396
97
Q.. With regard to the amalgamation of the two ordinances, 6396
A.
A.
989.
A.
ir Shelton Hooper:-
what did you understand was the idea for amalgamating
them? What was the reason the Government had I mean
the old Buildings Ordinance and Public Health Ordinance?
Improving the sanitation of the Colony.
Was it also a matter of improving the convenience of
16397
the working of the ordinance, - to facilitate the work,
so as to put sanitation and building of sanitary
properties under one head, so to speak?
Yes.
And that being so, the third Ordinance of 1903 having 16348
come into effect, dont you think it would still further
facilitate the work of the Department, if all the work was concentrate, rather than if certain sections should have to be administered by another Department,
the Public Works Department ?
I think it would be much better to hand over parts of
Part 3 entirely to the Public Works Department.
16399
All appertaining to concrete, and building construction,
would you say ↑
The Chairman:-
16400
A.
Yes.
You think it is better not to have two Departments 16.400
dovetailed into one another ?
A.
Yes.
Q+
、
A.
Yes, it would facilitate the work.
Q.
And you think it would be better to at lish that
And facilitate the work of the public, too, wouldnt 32
16407
Οι
A.
Y03.
16403
છેડે ..
And on faster consideration, do you consider it would
b better to make the ganitary Department entirely
independent of the Public Works Department, by
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
TILLICO. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE