1964.
the repeal of the "tanding Orders.
16065-80
You had not ?
A.
Tone whatever.
66
i
A.
984
де семье смета
16.065
16066
Then why did you not answer me directly, without
reference to the Law Officers of the Crown
Because I think it is part of the duty of the Chairman
to get the opinion of the Law Officers of the drown.
Although he had no doubt in his own mind ↑
16067
Q.
A.
Yes, certainly.
You had no doubt in your own mind that they were nul16068
and void, but you declined to answer that definitely?
A.
On the spur of the moment.
16069
A.
70 0.
A.
Q..
A.
Until you had taken the opinion of the Law Officers of
the Crown?
Yes, because it was a very important point, having been raised in that way.
Although you had no doubt ?
16070
I had spoken of it before. It had not been sprung upen
me. I knew shout it, before that Kesting.
Now, Dr Clark, you have had a converation with Dr 16071 Atkinson since he came back, and no doubt you have
spoken to him ahout the Standing orders, and this very point. I would like to ask you, if you called to his attention that he submitted theas Standing Orders to
the Board after the passing of the Ordinancs, for their approval, knowing that the Board had no power to make
them or a prove of them.
Yo, I did not, because the Standing Orders had been before the Board, I believe for some months, and were finally adopted, either on the 17th November, which is
printed here, or the 17th December, which is correct,
1903, and this Ordinance was passed on the 19th
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
36
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC
REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE