Jse
تما
1908.
WE Hou
BAClark eat.
927
A.
15729
Apparently they were.
Dont you think that is curtailing of their powers ↑ 15729
A.
I hardly think it is curtailing of their powers.
30 Q.
Then what does it mean ?
157730
A.
It is only the Board'sbusiness.
3/
Q.
I am speaking of the Board and its powers. Hy
152731
A.
32 2.
A.
33
original question is: Have not our powers been vertailąd
by this Ordinance ?
I dont think your powers have been curtailed.
Alright, previous to the passing of that Ordinance, 15132
were not all the Inspectors Officers of the Board ?
Yes, I believe they were,
And under that Ordinance, didnt they cease to be
Officers of the Board ?
15733
A.
Yes.
34 2.
15234
Is that not a curtailment of our powers, that we had to
csase directing them, because we had that power before,
and it is taken away by that. Ordinased ?
A.
Well, perhaps you might argue that.
15735
33 Q.
I would not argue that. I would ask you honestly, it is
not a legal thing.
A.
The Chairman:»
36
A
I dont think there is any loss of power. I know I hawS
been in the Department for 11 years, and I think things
go on, so far as the Board is concerned, in exactly the
same way as they did before the Ordinance.
195236
You said just now, that it was only since the passing
of the Amending Ordinance, 25 of 1903, that it was a
matter of courtesy to present the estimates to the
Board. Previous to the passing of that Ordinance, waant
it as a matter of course that they were presented to
the Board ?
Yes, I suppose they were,
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON
OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH- COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE