930.
2. S. Hope
947
Mr. a Carta Ex
surface ?
A.
Yes.
7597
Q.
The words "make good" have been struck out, and the
word "reconcrete" substituted?
7597
A.
Q.
7598
7598
I take it mo. (Looking at paper) Yes, that is so.
Now, are you aware that under sections 111 and 112, the owners of houses have to make the ground surfaces
good to the satisfaction of the Board, and those are
the words which are used here, and which someone has
altered ?
PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE
Reference:-
C.O. 537
A.
Yes.
7199
Did you suggest altering these words from those used
in the sections?
7599
A.
Certainly not. It was not an idea that the owner was
required to do something different to what the law
prescribes. That is not it.
7600
¡
INCENT Kors Y
Now, I will ask you as a tehnical man, is there any
difference between making good a surface of concrete,
and reconcreting ?
7600
A.
Yes, Sir.
A
7601 Q.
Therefore you think that that owner has been called
upon to do something different to what he is required
7607
by law to do Reconereting ia different to making
good ?
A.
Certainly, it im.
вой во
And the law only requires him to make good ↑
7602
A.
7642 Q.
A.
35
I would refer you to the last words of section 111,
"and so maintain".
Therefore you think with those words "and so maintain" 7603
that they may call upon the owner to reconɑrete,
instead of making good ↑
When the work is of such a bad quality, I am fully with
you. I think when the concrete is reasonably good, to
make good is reasonable, but when you open it up and
RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE PUBLIC REPRODUCED PHOTOGRAPHICALLY WITH COPYRIGHT PHOTOGRAPH - NOT TO BE