CO537-(35-36) — Page 442

CO537 Colonial Confidential Records 理藩院機密檔案 All

he's Hogs •

7604

Q.

A.

7605

Q.

A.

931.

948 hu a Carter in

find it of very bad quality, and does not comply with the sections, then I think reconcreting is the thing.

But dont you think that the law has limited it to 7604

making good?

That is so. They are the words.

I think you would admit that owners cannot be called 7605-

upon to do anything that is not required by the

Ordinance ?

Certainly not.

And the Ordinance specifies that if it is broken in 160b any way, it shall be made good ?

As

Yes.

7607

Q.

The Chairman:-

7608

As

And you admit that the word "reconcrete" has a wider 7607 meaning than "make good" ↑

Certainly. I take it that by making good a man will come and clear away and surface, and generally clean it, but with reconcreting, it means to disturb the

surface altogether.

7608 Dont you think that if you make a report that the concrete is of such an inferior quality that it canno be allowed to stand - dont you think it is perfectly reasonable under the law that"making good meano reconcreting, in the event of the concrete being

entirely bad ?

PUBLIC RECORD OFFICE

Reference:-

C.O. 537

NOT TO BE

COPYRIGHT PHOTOCOL WITH

REPRODUCED

RECORD OFFICE, LONDON OUT PERMISSION OF THE

A

That is my 'view.

7609 0.

And therefore, according to the law,

"making good

means

7609

entirely reconcreting, if the concrete is se bad that

it cannot be passed ?

That is the way I understand the law.

A.

[r Humphreys:=

How would you know it is so bad ?

7610

7610

A.

By opening it.

7611

Q.

And you would have to open about a square yard ↑

7641

A.

Hardly that. About 2 feet square. By opening up two

Canton tiles, which would be about 2'4" by 2'4".

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.