When next did you see Hang?-Some time later.
Why did you go to see him? -His còns are schoolmates of m'te and 1 am in the habit of going to the house,"
Did you ise Hang then?—Yes.
And what did be say?—He asked me about the matter and I told him it had been dropped. What made you say the matter was dropped? —Because I was not asked again for particulara'į of the monies taken,
THE HONGKONG, TELEGRAPH TUESDAY JUNE 22 1909
The Puisno Judge-We have got his merits; we don't want his he's history. (Laughter).
Mr. Calthrop-Now, you said yesterday that you have olian seao. Mr. Dizon lock up money, is his drawer ?—Yes;
And pay it later to the cashier ?--Yes, Didn't it seem extraordinary to you as the 14th January when he did not pay it over to the cashier at once?—l'look it for granted that bo did,
་
.
Why didn't you tell Mr. Hastings about This was about the beginning of March 7-Mr. Dixon keeping money in his drawer? 1 did not know at the time about any misappro- priation.
Yes,
About ten days after you saw Mr. Hung again ?—Yes,
What took place then ?—Nothing at all about this matter.
·
'Didn't you think, it vary strange that Mr. Dixon should keep this money when you saw him put it into his drawer? You saw him put it into bis drawer?-Yes, I think" be thought that I would take it for granted that Hehe had paid the money to the cashier.
At the interview in March did Hung say aby- thing about coming back as interpreter to Masara. Hastings, and Haslingi?—No. only suggested that question once.
What was
"upg doing at that time ?-Stay- ing at home.
Did he say anything to you about getting employmea ?-He said ho Koink
to Mestre. Brution and Hett.”~!
was
|
On the 2nd February did you go to see Mr. Hastings?-I am not sure. It was some time
about that date.
Did Llunguo. with you?—No,
And at that interview did you tell Mr. Has rings about r. Dikon tating the money?- When did he go to Mestre. Bruttop and Yes, I told Mr. Hastings of the interview 1
· Hati?—I don't know.
had with 'Mr. Bung.
"Have you gone to see him at Messrs, Bruf- ton and Hott's? Yes.
When? After I made my declaration,
• How long afterwardy? —I think the day alter. | What did you go there for?—I went to see the cashier.
What did you say to Hung there?- told bim I had made a declaration in this matter.
Did you tell bim what you had said in that declaration 7-Yes,
What did you tell him 7-1 told him he was not concerned in the matter at all.
Did he ask you nothing eine?-He asked mo"when the case was coming on and I told him on Friday!
Why did you tell Hung that he was not concerned in the matter?--Because he asked
-me
What more did you tell him??~No mora. When did you next see Hung?-On the very day Wong Hai Toog made his declara lion.
་
.:
Why did you go to see Mr. Hung?—Because „Mr. Hastingå u ki mé to go and see him to see whether Wong Hui Tong was telling the truth
or not..
Where, did this interview take place?-in bis huse, at 4 o'clock in the afternoon. It was raising then.
Why else was there?- Nobody else.
What took place told 'ung that Wong Hui Tong had in ide a declaration to the matter. I also told him what Wing said.
Tid you take the declaration with you ?—No, D.d you' remember by heart what Wong said? Not word for word. I knew what he said, because. I look his declaration down in shorthand,
27:
What did Hung bay,f -Ho said that what Wong aid was true
Did he say anything else?-He said he did not want to go tu Court to give evidence,
Why didn't you get ung to go with
I didn't think it was necessary.
you?-
But you knew nothing about the matter?-- Yes.
+1
Then why didn't you get Hung to come up and tell the story ?-Because I didn't think it was necessary.
How long have you been in a solicitor's office Nearly five years.
And you didok 'think it necessary for ung to come up and tell his owo story?—No.
You did not think it important for a mag in Mr. Dixen's position should be charged with stealing money ?—It did not occur to me to tell Hung to come.up
What caused you to make up your mind to tell Mr. Hastings about the matter?-Hung told me that it was a very dangerous position be was holding, and that there were no proofs for his story.
Was there any proof for the story when you told Mr. Hastings?—No,
Then, why did you tell Mr. Hastings ?—I put it to him to see what he would do.
It did not strike the witness as very peculiar that Mr. Hastings should consider taking Hang back when nung admitted taking the office money, The witness thought that the reason why My, Hastings, wanted Huog back
declaration he said that the arrangement made was to get particulars from tim. in bis
between Mr. Dixon and Wa Hi was that for the latter's case $, should ba paid down, and $25 for every other visit. Witness was not aware that Wan Hi, in his declaration, said that it was agreed upon 10 finish the case for $50. a thorsaih Juno' wit- he was asked to do so; and he did not think it Bess made a second declaration, simply because
becessary to set out all the facts of the Saturday afternoon interview which he had with Hung
Witness did not see the secund affidavit made
Why did he say be did not want to go 19-by Mr. Dixon. The details of Mr. D.xon's affi- "Court?-Breuse he had a hand in the matter.
davit were not known to witness at the time he made his declaration.
I did not know what be meant by that.
· And?—I asked him what would be do ́if 'Mr. Dixon subpoenaed him.
What did he say?-He said he could not Bland any cross-examinatior, and that be must tell the truth then.
What else?-He said that M7 Lo Chee Sau, the late Mr. Reginald. Harding's interpretes, had been to see him to take a declaration in this master to support Mr. Dixo. Hung told Lo Chice Sau that he would not come to Court in the matter.
+
Re-examined by Mr. Potter (for the prosecu- Hung back into the office. Huog suggested it, tion)Mr. Hastings never agreed to taking
and witness supported it. All that Mr. castings said was that he would consider the matter.
The witness was then excused, and the next one to be called was Gulab, which means Rose in English, who stated that he was once jemadar'in the Hongkong Police Force. He was in the Forceforseven yeas, Idfanuary last he went to Messrs. Hastings and Hastings office in regard to a case in which he sought to get a peusion from the Government as he had been dischar noted from the Force. Witdess saw Mr. Dixon, who took charge of the case. Witness paid bim (Mr. Dixon) $40 on the 17th January,
Anything else?—Nuthing more about this matter. I left about balf past Iour..
Did you ace Hung the same day?-No;
since then,
Do you know where Hung is now?—I tisderstand he is in Canton,
The Pajsne Judge-Do you remember on what date bung left the office?-On the 31st December last.
Mr. Calthrop When "ung left did you aug: gest that another interpreter should be en- gaged 7-Yes.
Who was to be engaged?-"everal. Was not Lo Chee Sau to be engaged 7-Yes. Who suggested that Lo Chee Sau abould be engaged ?—I think it was Mr. Dixon.
Didn't Mr. Hastings speak to you about this? | Yes.
The Puisce judge-About La Chec Sau?- Yes.
Mr. Calibrop-What did Mr. Hastings say about this ?-Nothing. I asked Mr. Hastings why Me Hoog was leaving.*.*
What did Mr. Hastings say?—He said that Hung thought that he (Mr. Hastings) wanted
Lo Chen Sau in,
Didn't you say that if La Chee Sau came into. the office you would resign ?—Yes.
You did not want Lo Chee Sau in the office?
***No.
And you knew that Mr. Dixon wanted La
Ches Sau in the office?-So I understood.
You were annoyed with Mr. Dixon for re- commending Lo Chee Sau)~No.
Wasn't it a fact that you wanted Hung to come back so that Lo. Ches. Sad should not come in?-No;^at the time we had a new interpretas.
Who is be?-Mr. Chow,
Did he take Mr. Hdog's place?-He took the place where Mr. Hung used to sit; bạt I don't know whether he is considered to be the -chief interpreter or not.
[Chow supposed to replace Hung?
Is be as capable an'interpreter as Hung? No; but he can transfate better.
.
I put it to you that he can't interpret ?—That
· Is for Me Hastings or Mr. Dixon to say、
In your opinion can he interpret property
As well as tlung ?—No.
Where did he come from?-He used to be In Hongkong some eighteen years ago. Ho came from Canten.......--
Mr. Potter-Did you speak to him through an interpreter, or by yourself?
Witness-By myself.
Did you get a receipt?--I did not ask for pae. And in March you paid another $50 7-Yes. Did you get a receipt?-No. Mr. Calthrop (cross-examining)-Are you quite sure you paid $40 and not 530-1 paid. $40.
What made you remember you paid $40 and not 5jo?-1 gave him four Sto notes.
.
Un the 27th May last you made a 'declaration in this matter?—Yes.
Why didn't you say in the declaration that
payments?—I was sot alked, so I did not say you made a note of the date you made the
$0.
You were not told at the time that Mr. Hast. ng books showed that only $30 had been paid?-No:
Mr. Hastings did not tell you what was in the book at the time?—No. -
If he had told you that his books showed that
20
What made you go to the office on the second occasion? I frequently, went there to learn how my case was going on,
Were you speaking, then, to Mr. Hastings in English? Yes.
Then you understand perfectly well what' questions I am putting to you without the aid of the interpreter ?I can't say I can under stand all your questions. Since I left the Police Force I am a bit deaf,'
If I speak loud enough can you understand me without an intarpreter 2-Yel
After your statement was signed what hap- pened I left the office and went away.
When did you next see Mr. Hastings?— Many times afterwards, and on one occasion 1 was told that my case would not go before the Governor-in-Council."
Did you go to another firm of solicitors in cagard.to your.case?--Yes._1_webt-to-Mesara Wilkinson and Grist and had a petition sout to England.
What made you change from Mr. Hastings to Me Wilkinson?-Because Mr. Dixon told me it would cost m: $.oo'to send the patien to the Secretary of State. 1. thought that was too much.
The Court the adjourned for tiffia.
When the Court resumed after the adjourn ment, Gulab was recalled to the witness'stond. Ile denied that he knew a man named Aliana, an Indian draper.
Mr. Calthrop-Do you know an Indian dra- por living below. Mr. Hastings' office?
Witoess-No.
Do you remember speaking to anyone about this case I can't remember.
....Do you remember anyone speaking to you in Mr. Hastings' office about this case?! cant say,
}
Will you swear that an fodian dida't ask you outside Mr. Hastings' office that your case was Costing you a lot of money-i speak to a lot of Indians..
Dida't you tell an Indian that it cost you 180 for the case ?-No.
How long wore you there?-A little less than two years.
Where did you go after that ?—To Leads; to the firm of Simpson and Simpson," t
How long were you there ?-Two years,
the idea of managing his Winsford practice.
Where did you go then ?-To my father with Did you go anywhere alas before you cams here?-1 was with him until I started to Correspond with Mr. George Hastings to come bere.
How did you get to correspond with Mr. George Hantinga?—I answered an advertire meat in the Law Times newspaper.
Did you have an interview with Mr. George Hastings?—Yes, at Preston,
Did Mr. George Hastings day on whose be-
half he was acting?--Yes, his brother, Mr. Jehn
astings
L
What took place ?-He told me the salary. which his brother was prepared to pay; he told me be bimself was coming out to his brother's business with a view to succeeding his brother In the business,
Did you discuss the terme ?—Yes; and I asked him (Mr. George Hastings) whether my prospects in the East would be good. He told me he bad not been out to the East before, but if 1 succeeded I would undoubtedly in the and obtain a partnership.
:.
What happened next?-1 furälsted bim with textimonials and a health certificate. In' the end I signed the agreement.
..
For how long -Four years. What wore you paid under that agreement? -£315 per year.
Where did you go to live when you got here? The Peak Hotel
What did you have to pay there?—I shared room with another man, and I think it cant me about Sito a month.
་,
What were your expenses during that year? -Very httle. I was not a member of the Club then. My expenses then would not be more than Siso a month.
In local currency what did you get a mouth? When did you leave the Police Force 7-OaBetween $475 and $300 a month. It de 1st February, 1908,
pended on the Exchange.
How was it you came to leave it ?-A made- up case was brought against me.
What was this made-up case about?-A charge of indecency.
With whom was this charge of indecency made?-A Chinese inkong.
And in consequence of that you were dis missed from the Force? -Yes.
And lost all your peusion?—Yes. Did you before you were dismissed from the the Force sign a confession?-1 did not. I said I had witnesses to be brought forward for me.
Did you sign any document at all?-1 signed ons paper, which the Assistant Superintendent of Police made me sign. The paper was about getting my pension.
Did you sign a blank piece of paper?—Yes. And the Assistant Superintendent of Police
wrote abɔva ji ?--Yes,
ment?—Nobody.
Woo was present when you signed that docu-
T
|
How much did you save out of that ?-About $100 a month..
Did you get a rise in salary?—Yes,
Why ?-Because of the rise in the Exchange, and I complained.
What rise did you get?-$25.
When did you get the next rise?In October Under my agreement I was entiled to a $25 rise after the first year.
· Did you get a rise in the second year?-1 don't think i was entitled to a rise theo. Then I was put on a fixed dollar bäsis.
Before Mr. Joba nastings left for home in i957 witness communicated by letter to Mr. George Hastings about the question of his partnership. Witness wanted more than a verbal promise as to the partnership matter. Three months before witness signed his second agreement whereby Mr. John Hastings was made
a partner, in the month of March last witants
was acting for the Kwong Hing Chaung firm rolice at that time?~Mr. Wodehouse.
Who was the Assistant Superintendent of agaibit Messrs. Reuter, Brocksimane and
Company.
Do you suggest, that after you had signed that document, Mr. Wodehouse wrote the coo- fession above your signature.
house give you a testimonial when you left Mr. Potter (re-examining)-Did Mr. Wode.
the Force? -Yes.
.
The testimonial was produced, and read as follows:-
Jemadar_GulabKpan_served_about 17 years in the Hongkong Police, and having joined from the Todian Army, when he had about a years' service. He has been dis-Į missed, with total loss of pension, from the In February, 1908, for an act, of gross indecency with a Chinese conflable."
Daring bis 17 years' service ia the Police ,his conduct had been exemplary, and he has had practically a clean defaulter sheet. I have the highest opinion of his ability, and bis attainments are quito exceptional, He has a very good knowledge of English (written and calloquial), and of Chinese colloquial, He is also a very good will shot and has a good knowledge of drill. His loss will be severely felt in the Force. In the interests of discipline, bis offence could not be overlooked, and had to be severely dealt with, on account of his res- ponsible position as a Native Officer, · I trast, however, that he will be able to get a fresh start, and obtain employment suit- able to a man of his capabilities.
Heisthoroughly reliable and trustworthy,
(Sd.) P. F. J. WODEISQUSE, Deputy Supt. Hongkong Police.
17. z. 8, This concluded the case for the prosecution. MR, DIXON IN THE DIX... Mr. Dixon was then called to the box, and he stated that he came from Cheshire, England.
Did you have much money paid to you in. that case 7-Largè sums were paid for costs, Amounting altogether to between $13,500 or $14,000 A good deal of the money, was paid- to me personally. Whenever I received the money. myself I cats:nd it myself in the rough cash book. The entries to the rough cash book indicate whe receives the money. Your Lordships may remember_that_in_money_ cases Mr. George Hastings gave receipts for the monies. I might have received the money myself, bai I did not give the receipt my- sell I might also say that in many cares Wong Hui Tong nevar paid it for him, and he (Wong Hui Toog), when he was pre- sent was particularly careful, not only to gets receipt, but to have the receipt travolated to lim and or bit agent.
On the 27th January, 1908, what was the stae of the Reuter, Brockefoans action —¡ should imagine that pleadings were about cloied.
Was anything else paid to you by or on betalt of the Kwong Hing Cheung braides the $.to-No...
Did you ask Wong Hui Tong on that day
to lend you any money?—No.
Could Wong talk English ?-No, not a word. Mr Hung always acted as interpreter.
did not. On that day did you receive $100 as a loan?
bid you receive it as a present ?—I did not, On the following day did you aik Wong for aur money 7-Yes-$50 for costs... -
"Did you ask him for a loan ?--I did not.
Did you ask him to give you any money? I did not...
** feds trus that he paid you $150 for yourself?
is not trup.
kis untrae. when he said he lent you Szao on bat day? It is untrue.
Este the witness, from the cash book, recited
To-day's Advertisements.
NOTICE TO CONSIGNEES.
FROM CALCUTTA, PENANG AND SINGAPORE
THE Steamship
.
"LIGHTNING," having airived from the above Parts, Con signees of Cargo are hereby informed that their Goods will be delivered froin alongside.". will be landed at once, at Consignees' risk and Cargo impeding the discharge.of the Vessel
expense.
Entimations.
THE
DAIRY FARM COMPANY, LIMITED.
EXTRA CHOICE SUGAR CURED
BACON and HAM.
VERY MILD
24th fakt, will be landed at Consignees risk HONEYSUCKLE
Cargo remaining on board after 4 P.M., of the
and expanse.“
and PENANG are requested to take IM. Consiguens of Cargo from SINGAPORE
MEDIATE DELIVERY of their Goods charge of the vessel will be landed and stored from alongside, such Cargo impeding the dis
at Consignees' risk and expense.
No Fire Insurance has been affected. Bills of Lading will be countersigned by the Undersigned,
4
DAVID SASSOON & Co., LIMITED,
Agents, Hongkong, 22nd June, 1959.
1500
FROM EUROPE.
THE H, A. L. Steamship
"SEGOVIA,"
THE
Con-"
Captain Sachs, having arrived, signes of Cargo are hereby requested to send In their Bills of Lading for countersignature by the Undersigned and to take immediate delivery of their goods from alongside."
Optional Cargo will be forwarded unless notice to the contrary be given before TO- DAY,
Any Cargo impeding her discharge will be and/or extra hazardous Godowns of the Hong- landed at Consigate's risk into the hazardous
Limited, and, stored at Consigneas' risk and kong and Kowloon Wharf and Godowa Co, expense.
All Claims must be presented within ten days of the steamer's arrival here after, which date they cannot be recognised..
No Claims will be admitted after the Goodı. undelivered after the 19th sont, will be sab have left the Godowns, and all Good's remaining
ject to rent,
All broker, chafed, and damaged Goods are to be left in the Godowns, where they will be examined on the 28th inst, at 3 P..
No Fire Insurance has been effected,
HAMBURG-AMERIKA LINIE,
Hongkong Office. Hongkong, zand June, 1909.
(501
as to what he had paid. A'copy of the ledger. was handed to Wong and he said that he had not been credited with 17,000.
Witness explained the positioning was quite satisfied-and shortly atterwha paid instructions to supply Wong with a cpy of the a further sum of $4,000. Withous dij dot give
ledger, for that would be unintelligible to any.
e. Witness gave instructions to have a pro- per account made aul-to show how the posi-. tion stood between Wong and the firm.
Did you explain to him again the state of the accounts ?—Yes; in great detail,.
What happened atter that?-Oh'ith_fany- aty a further sum of $2,000 was paid for costs What happened after that? The next thing. not to take the matter to the Privy Council, and Reuter, Brockelmand and Company decided
'we were' in a position to asitle up with' the client
As far as you remember when did you next see Wong Hul 'Toog?-Sove after, and I told him that Reuter, Brockelmann were not going on with the appeal.
When was that ?--The end of March of the beginning of April.
What took place then I think he called for an account. I think he also saw Mr. Hastings.
What happened at the interview ?—The ac- count was interpreted to him and explained to him by Tam, and he appeared to be perfecily satisfied with the items, except two-$6,000- and $3,000 costs between solicitor and client. He thought it was rather ↑ stiff" He asked to be
BRAND,
Only 60 conta a lb.- Hongkong, 4th June, 1909.
casonable with him, and I said I would sea bim C
again on the next day in Mr. John Hastings'
room.
He again complained of the charges and asked for a detailed bill. It was promised that be should have one,—which was-done went through the books again and made out the bill which was a little bit more. (Laughter), The cheque was made out and Wong was paid $10,900,
Did you see Wong Hai Tong again in the
· matter ?---1- don't think I saw him agafa until | 1 saw him lu' Coun.
יי
Do you remember being consulted on 8th January by Wan Hi 7-Yes,
Who brought Wan HI? - I think Tam did. "What happened?--The man, through the in- terpreter, informed me that a friend of his bad
$39 and not Sio had been paid would you then have swoin that So had been paid?- paid His father was a solicitor, and practised at whit payments were made to him add to other been arrested for administering. obnoxious
$40 and would swear to it.
When did you first see Me, Hastings, in this smatter -I did not go to Mr. Hastings. I went to Mr. Dixon..
Have you soon Me. Hastings at all in coonec. top with this inquiry?-No.
Do you know what this pressot inquiry is about? No.
Do you know what the matter was about
and I was asked to make a statement. when you made your declaration?—I paid $ |
Who asked you to make the statement? About ten days after I paid the $40 I went tó Messrs. Hastings and Hastings office and Mr. "Hastings asked me how my case was going on. | 'I said shat Mt. Dixon told me he would write to the Governor, Then he asked me how much manny had paid to the office. I said 540, and he took down my statement.
What happened then?--I signed the state. meat.
Who was present?-Nobody was 'pressat when my statement was being taken. Mr. The Chiaf Justico—I don't think we want to Wilkinson came in lator, and I signed the
| @{stament.
Norwich and Winsford His father conducted his own business he had no partners. He bad practised for about forty years.
'Mr. Calthrop-How, many brothers bave you ?-Five.
Are any of these in the legal prefassion 2~ Two,
What are they doing respectively?—My older brother is a partner in the firm of Martin and Dixon, in Liverpool; The other brother passed bis final examination in June and is now with my father.
|
|
Hadenied, as each sairy was made to the in aspect of the Rester, Brockelmann case,
Cout, aver receiving monies from the man Wog either as loan or as gifts.
Iit tran that you were paid on the aged July$500?—It is not true, Your Lordship had reseved his decision then, and judgment was delinred on the 25th July, 1978.
The ques Gion)í costs was reserved.
This is only t
show how unreasonable and unnecessary it wont be to ask for farther costs at that point of th case.
lat untrue he asked for a receipt for that
Have you ever spoken to Mr. Hastings about your father?-Before I came out hore I spoke | 5507--He didn't pay anything. He never to Mr. George Hastings, Mr. John Hastings ||unkd for a receipt. knows a little bit of my home lite,
When did you fast start to study the law?
In 1894.
Where ?-In Liverpool."
In what firm ?Thompson and McMaster, When did you pain your final ?--In· 1899, after five years at-it-
----
When were you admitted ?—The same year. What did you do after your articles were finished?-1 had conveyancing clerkship down in Hereford.
When did you see Wong Hai Tong next? Frquently spretty nearly every day, between the on of July and the end of August, **
Jid you make entries in your diary?—You, avty lima 1 recaivad payments.
roceeding, witness said that he received all moies deposited in Count on socount of costs forbe Kwong Hing Cheung firm, and this was emred in the ledger, Thin was in November, Wing Hal Tong asked for an account, and Woans, through an interpreter, satisfied him"
ASAHI BEER.
SAPPORO BEER,
OBTAINABLE EVERYWHERE.
MITSUI BUSSAN KAISHA,
Sple Agents.
THE HINA PROVIDENT LOAN AND
MORTGAGE CO., LD,
(CAPITAL PAID UP...............$1,150,000). LORDS on Mortgage of House Property, &c. Goods received on Storage. Advances made on Marchandise: Loans made on the Providanı System.
(Rates and Particulars on application),
THE OFFICE OF LEGE RUSTER, EXECUTOR OF WILLS, ATTORNEY, &c:/ Undertaken and Exocused.
SHEWAN, TOMES & 00... General Managers. Hangkang, 10th March, rool
NOTICE TO SUBSCRIBERS,
drug for procuring abortion, and he wanted me to defend him. He asked me what the masFROM and after 1st January, 1909, the rates of Subscription to the Hong kong
follows:-
ter would cost, but as the charge was a serious |- Telegraph (daily and weekly issues) will be as one and might have been sent to the Criminal Sessions, I could not quoto a lump sum, “,
What was said as to costr.?—I don't think an agreement was come to. I think I asked him for something on account.
What did ba do?—He paid 550 os that day and I, ho and Tam weat'up to the Police.
dence, and it was.stated-ibat nalexs sofficient Court. The police did not have sufficient evi-
evidence was forthcoming they would abandon the case. The case was adjourned för a week, and 'as i understood, that the police were going to withdraw the charge, I did not go to
the trouble to take the defendant's statement or
that of his witness. The next week the case was withdrawn,
Have you ever received money from clients and placed it in your right-hand drawer?—No, that drawer was my private drawer. What monies 1 received, and the shroff was not pre- sont, I always put into my safe, j when the Court rose patil tomorrow morning - Mr. Dixon's examination had not concluded as 10.30 c'clock, when he will have to go bader cross-examination,
DAILY-536 per EDDUM, *WEEKLY—SIS per apnum.
The rates per quarter and per mensem, pro› portional Subscriptions for any period Jess. than one month will be charged as for a full month...
་་
The 'daily jârue in delivered fres when the address is accessible to messenger. Peak subscribers can have 'sheir copies delivered at their residences without any extra chargs. On copies sent by post an additional $1,50 per quarter is charged for pòmage,
The postage on the weekly loss to any part Single Copies, Dally, tes centr.
of the world is go cents per quarter,
twenty-fivo canis (for cash only)
(PAYABLE IN ADVANGR) There will be no relate to Subscribers as heretofore.
By Order,
THE Longkong Tali
Page 5Page 6