RAS-1973 — Page 95

RASHKB Journal 皇家亞洲學會香港分會學刊 All AI Reviewed

FIVE ART CATALOGUES

89

In a word, during the thousand years between the Sung and the Ch'ing dynasties, documentary records of calligraphies and paintings of past dynasties were never compiled by following editing principles other than these two: either joint or separate. Among the above listed Ch'ing art catalogues, five of them conformed with the separate principle, while eighteen others followed the joint principle. Thus from the ratio of 1:3.6 shown between the two groups, it is clear that although these two editing principles both made their appearance in the Sung dynasty, by the Ch'ing period, catalogues that conformed with the joint principle by far out-numbered those that followed the separate principle.

The Kwangtung Art Catalogues

II

The compilation of the catalogues for the five Kwangtung collections is, in fact, closely related to the above-mentioned editing principles: either joint or separate. For example, in his Fêng-man-lou shu-hua-lu (4 chuan, completed around the 20th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1840) Yeh Mêng-lung (1775-1832) adopted the principle of separating records of calligraphy and painting of past dynasties into two independent sections. However, in the other four catalogues, i.e., Wu Yung-kuang's (1773-1843) Hsin-ch'ou hsiao-hsia-chi (5 chuan, completed in the 21st year of the Tao Kuang era, 1841); Pan Chêng-wei's (1791-1850) T'ing-fan-lou shu-hua-chi (5 chuan, completed in the 23rd year of the Tao Kuang era, 1843) and supplement (2 chuan, completed around the 29th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1849); Liang T'ing-nan's (1796-1861) T'ing-hua-t'ing shu-hua-pa (4 chuan, completed in the 5th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1855); and Kung Kuang-tao's (1832-1880) Yüeh-hsüeh-lou shu-hua-lu (5 chuan, completed in the 11th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1861), the compilers all followed the principle of combining the records of calligraphy and painting together in one chronicle.

Thus, among the five art catalogues, only one was edited in accordance with the separate principle, and the other four all adhered to the joint principle. This ratio of 1:4 seems to be quite close to the 1:3.6 ratio shown between catalogues respectively edited by

Edit History

2026-05-12 19:34:25 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
FIVE ART CATALOGUES 89 In a word, during the thousand years between the Sung and the Ch'ing dynasties, documentary records of calligraphies and paintings of past dynasties were never compiled by following editing principles other than these two: either joint or separate. Among the above listed Ch'ing art catalogues, five of them conformed with the separate principle, while eighteen others followed the joint principle. Thus from the ratio of 1:3.6 shown between the two groups, it is clear that although these two editing principles both made their appearance in the Sung dynasty, by the Ch'ing period, catalogues that conformed with the joint principle by far out-numbered those that followed the separate principle. The Kwangtung Art Catalogues II The compilation of the catalogues for the five Kwangtung collections is, in fact, closely related to the above-mentioned editing principles: either joint or separate. For example, in his Fêng-man-lou shu-hua-lu (4 chuan, completed around the 20th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1840) Yeh Mêng-lung (1775-1832) adopted the principle of separating records of calligraphy and painting of past dynasties into two independent sections. However, in the other four catalogues, i.e., Wu Yung-kuang's (1773-1843) Hsin-ch'ou hsiao-hsia-chi (5 chuan, completed in the 21st year of the Tao Kuang era, 1841); Pan Chêng-wei's (1791-1850) T'ing-fan-lou shu-hua-chi (5 chuan, completed in the 23rd year of the Tao Kuang era, 1843) and supplement (2 chuan, completed around the 29th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1849); Liang T'ing-nan's (1796-1861) T'ing-hua-t'ing shu-hua-pa (4 chuan, completed in the 5th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1855); and Kung Kuang-tao's (1832-1880) Yüeh-hsüeh-lou shu-hua-lu (5 chuan, completed in the 11th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1861), the compilers all followed the principle of combining the records of calligraphy and painting together in one chronicle. Thus, among the five art catalogues, only one was edited in accordance with the separate principle, and the other four all adhered to the joint principle. This ratio of 1:4 seems to be quite close to the 1:3.6 ratio shown between catalogues respectively edited by
Baseline (Original)
FIVE ART CATALOGUES 89 In a word, during the thousand years between the Sung and the Ch'ing dynasties, documentary records of calligraphies and pain- tings of past dynasties were never compiled by following editing principles other than these two: either joint or separate. Among the above listed Ch'ing art catalogues, five of them conformed with the separate principle, while eighteen others followed the joint prin- ciple. Thus from the ratio of 1:3.6 shown between the two groups, it is clear that although these two editing principles both made their appearance in the Sung dynasty, by the Ch'ing period, catalogues that conformed with the joint principle by far out-numbered those that followed the separate principle. The Kwangtung Art Catalogues II The compilation of the catalogues for the five Kwangtung collec- tions is in fact, closely related to the above-mentioned editing prin- ciples: either joint or separate. For example, in his Fêng-man-lou shu-hua-lu **** (4 chuan, completed around the 20th year of the Tao Kuang erat. 1840) Yeh Mêng-lung (1775-1832) adopted the principle of separating records of calli- graphy and painting of past dynasties into two independent sections. However, in the other four catalogues, i.e. Wu Yung-kuang's (1773-1843) Hsin-ch'ou hsiao-hsia-chi ✯✯ I (5 chúan, completed in the 21st year of the Tao Kuang era, 1841); Pan Chêng- wei's *£# (1791-1850) T'ing-fan-lou shu-hua-chi #*1 (5 chuan, completed in the 23rd year of the Tao Kuang era, 1843) and supplement (2 chuan, completed around the 29th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1849) Liang T’ing-nan's✯✯ (1796-1861) Tiêng- hua-t'ing shu-hua-pa *** (4 chuan, completed in the 5th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1855); and Kung Kuang-tao's (1832-1880) Yüeh-hsüeh-lou shu-hua-lu✶✶✶✰★ (5 chuan, completed in the 11th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1861), the compilers all followed the principle of combining the records of calligraphy and painting together in one chronicle. Thus, among the five art catalogues, only one was edited in ac- cordance with the separate principle, and the other four all adhered to the joint principle. This ratio of 1:4 seems to be quite close to the 1:3.6 ratio shown between catalogues respectively edited by
2026-05-12 19:34:25 · Baseline
View content

FIVE ART CATALOGUES

89

In a word, during the thousand years between the Sung and the Ch'ing dynasties, documentary records of calligraphies and pain- tings of past dynasties were never compiled by following editing principles other than these two: either joint or separate. Among the above listed Ch'ing art catalogues, five of them conformed with the separate principle, while eighteen others followed the joint prin- ciple. Thus from the ratio of 1:3.6 shown between the two groups, it is clear that although these two editing principles both made their appearance in the Sung dynasty, by the Ch'ing period, catalogues that conformed with the joint principle by far out-numbered those that followed the separate principle.

The Kwangtung Art Catalogues

II

The compilation of the catalogues for the five Kwangtung collec- tions is in fact, closely related to the above-mentioned editing prin- ciples: either joint or separate. For example, in his Fêng-man-lou shu-hua-lu **** (4 chuan, completed around the 20th year of the Tao Kuang erat. 1840) Yeh Mêng-lung (1775-1832) adopted the principle of separating records of calli- graphy and painting of past dynasties into two independent sections. However, in the other four catalogues, i.e. Wu Yung-kuang's ✯ (1773-1843) Hsin-ch'ou hsiao-hsia-chi ✯ ✯✯ I † (5 chúan, completed in the 21st year of the Tao Kuang era, 1841); Pan Chêng- wei's *£# (1791-1850) T'ing-fan-lou shu-hua-chi #*1

(5 chuan, completed in the 23rd year of the Tao Kuang era, 1843) and supplement (2 chuan, completed around the 29th year of the Tao Kuang era, 1849) Liang T’ing-nan's✯✯ (1796-1861) Tiêng- hua-t'ing shu-hua-pa *** (4 chuan, completed in the 5th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1855); and Kung Kuang-tao's (1832-1880) Yüeh-hsüeh-lou shu-hua-lu✶✶✶✰★ (5 chuan, completed in the 11th year of the Hsien Fêng era, 1861), the compilers all followed the principle of combining the records of calligraphy and painting together in one chronicle.

Thus, among the five art catalogues, only one was edited in ac- cordance with the separate principle, and the other four all adhered to the joint principle. This ratio of 1:4 seems to be quite close to the 1:3.6 ratio shown between catalogues respectively edited by

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.