1912_CODE_OF_CIVIL_PROCEDURE — Page 179

HK Historical Laws 香港歷史法例 All AI Reviewed

1310

No. 3 of 1901.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

[J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]

FORM NO. 18.

Reply.

[s 168.]

Action No. of 19

[J. A. App. E, Sec. III.]

[J. A. App. B, Part II, form 6.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between A.B., Plaintiff,

and

C.D., Defendant.

The plaintiff says that--

Reply.

1. As to the first paragraph of the statement of defence, he joins issue.

2. As to the second paragraph thereof, he accepts the $200 in satisfaction.

The plaintiff as to the counterclaim says that

3. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by ordering extras and material alterations in the works.

4. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by preventing the plaintiff from having access to the premises till a week after the agreed time.

(Signed.)

NOTE. The latter part of this Form applies only where the Counterclaim has been filed before the Reply.

FORM NO. 19.

[s. 174.]

Statement of Defence including an Objection in Point of Law.

Action No. of 19

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between A.B., Plaintiff,

and

C.D., Defendant.

Statement of Defence.

1. The goods were not supplied to E.F. on the guarantee.

2. The defendant will object that the guarantee discloses a past consideration on the face of it.

(Signed.)

FORM No. 20.

Interrogatories.

[s. 188.]

Action No. of 19

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between A.B., Plaintiff,

and

C.D., E.F. and G.H., Defendants.

Interrogatories on behalf of the above-named plaintiff [or defendant C.D.] for the examination of the above-named defendants E.F. and G.H. [or plaintiff.]

Edit History

2026-05-03 01:45:59 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
1310 No. 3 of 1901. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. [J. A. App. E, Sec. II.] FORM NO. 18. Reply. [s 168.] Action No. of 19 [J. A. App. E, Sec. III.] [J. A. App. B, Part II, form 6.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between A.B., Plaintiff, and C.D., Defendant. The plaintiff says that-- Reply. 1. As to the first paragraph of the statement of defence, he joins issue. 2. As to the second paragraph thereof, he accepts the $200 in satisfaction. The plaintiff as to the counterclaim says that 3. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by ordering extras and material alterations in the works. 4. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by preventing the plaintiff from having access to the premises till a week after the agreed time. (Signed.) NOTE. The latter part of this Form applies only where the Counterclaim has been filed before the Reply. FORM NO. 19. [s. 174.] Statement of Defence including an Objection in Point of Law. Action No. of 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between A.B., Plaintiff, and C.D., Defendant. Statement of Defence. 1. The goods were not supplied to E.F. on the guarantee. 2. The defendant will object that the guarantee discloses a past consideration on the face of it. (Signed.) FORM No. 20. Interrogatories. [s. 188.] Action No. of 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between A.B., Plaintiff, and C.D., E.F. and G.H., Defendants. Interrogatories on behalf of the above-named plaintiff [or defendant C.D.] for the examination of the above-named defendants E.F. and G.H. [or plaintiff.]
Baseline (Original)
1310 No. 3 of 1901. CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. [J. A. App. E, Sec. II.] FORM NO. 18. Reply. [s 168.) Action No. of 19 [J. A. App. E, Sec. III.] [J. A. App. B, Part II, form 6.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between A.B., Plaintiff, and The plaintiff says that-- C.D., Defendant. Reply. 1. As to the first paragraph of the statement of defence, he joins issue. 2. As to the second paragraph thereof, he accepts the $200 in satisfaction. The plaintiff as to the counterclaim says that 3. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by ordering extras and material alterations in the works. 4. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by preventing the plaintiff from having access to the premises till a week after the agreed time. (Signed.) NOTE. The latter part of this Form applies only where the Counterclaim has been filed before the Reply. FORM NO. 19. [s. 174. Statement of Defence including an Objection in Point of Law. Action No. of 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, The defendant says that-- ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between 4.B., Plaintiff, and C.D., Defendant. Statement of Defence. 1. The goods were not supplied to E.F. on the guarantee. 2. The defendant will object that the guarantee discloses a past consideration on the face of it. FORM No. 20. Interrogatories. (Signed.) [s. 188.] Action No. of 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. Between A.B., Plaintiff, and C.D., E.F. and G.H., Defendants. Interrogatories on behalf of the above-named plaintiff [or defendant C.D.] for the examination of the above-named defendants E.F. and G.H. [or plaintiff.]
2026-05-03 01:45:59 · Baseline
View content

1310

No. 3 of 1901.

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

[J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]

FORM NO. 18.

Reply.

[s 168.)

Action No.

of 19

[J. A.

App. E, Sec. III.]

[J. A.

App. B,

Part II,

form 6.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG, ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between A.B., Plaintiff,

and

The plaintiff says that--

C.D., Defendant.

Reply.

1. As to the first paragraph of the statement of defence, he joins issue.

2. As to the second paragraph thereof, he accepts the $200 in satisfaction.

The plaintiff as to the counterclaim says that

3. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by ordering extras and material alterations in the works.

4. The defendant waived the liquidated damages by preventing the plaintiff from having access to the premises till a week after the agreed time.

(Signed.)

NOTE. The latter part of this Form applies only where the Counterclaim has been filed before the Reply.

FORM NO. 19.

[s. 174.

Statement of Defence including an Objection in Point of Law.

Action No.

of 19

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,

The defendant says that--

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between 4.B., Plaintiff,

and

C.D., Defendant.

Statement of Defence.

1. The goods were not supplied to E.F. on the guarantee.

2. The defendant will object that the guarantee discloses a past consideration on the face of it.

FORM No. 20.

Interrogatories.

(Signed.)

[s. 188.]

Action No.

of 19

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,

ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.

Between A.B., Plaintiff,

and

C.D., E.F. and G.H., Defendants.

Interrogatories on behalf of the above-named plaintiff [or defendant C.D.] for the examination of the above-named defendants E.F. and G.H. [or plaintiff.]

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.