CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
No. 3 of 1901.
1309
Particulars ---
1909. 1st January to 31st May.
C.
$ To rebuilding house at Victoria, as per contract dated the 24th December, 1908
00
To extras, as per account delivered
Paid on account
Balance due
5,400
243 00
5,643 00
3,000 00
2,643 00
The plaintiff also seeks to recover interest on the above balance from the 31st May, 1909, till payment or judgment.
FORM No. 16.
(Signed.)
(s. 143.]
[J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]
Action No.
of 19
Statement of Defence.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
Between A.B., Plaintiff,
and
C.D., Defendant.
Statement of Defence.
1. Except as to $200, parcel of the money claimed, the architect did not grant his certificate pursuant to the contract.
2. As to $200, parcel of the money claimed, the defendant brings [or has brought] into Court $200, and says that that sum is enough to satisfy the plaintiff's claim herein pleaded to.
FORM No. 17.
(Signed.)
(s. 163.]
Action No.
of 19
J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
Between A.B., Plaintiff,
and
C.D., Defendant.
Counterclaim.
The defendant says that--
1. The contract mentioned in the statement of claim herein contained a clause whereby it was provided that the plaintiff should complete the works by the 31st March, 1909, or in default pay to the defendant $10 a day for every subsequent day during which the works should remain unfinished, and they so remained unfinished for 61 days to the 31st May, 1909.
The defendant counterclaims $610.
(Signed.)
* As amended by No. 43 of 1912 Supp. Sched.
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.
No. 3 of 1901.
1309
Particulars ---
1909. 1st January to 31st May.
C.
$ To rebuilding house at Victoria, as per contract dated the 24th December, 1908
00
To extras, as per account delivered
Paid on account
Balance due
5,400
243 00
5,643 00
3,000 00
2,643 00
The plaintiff also seeks to recover interest on the above balance from the 31st May, 1909, till payment or judgment.
FORM No. 16.
(Signed.)
(s. 143.]
[J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]
Action No.
of 19
Statement of Defence.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,
The defendant says that-
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
Between A.B., Plaintiff,
and
C.D., Defendant.
Statement of Defence.
1. Except as to $200, parcel of the mouey claimed, the architect did not grant his certificate pursuant to the contract.
2. As to $200, parcel of the money claimed, the defendant brings [or has brought] into Court $200, and says that that sum is enough to satisfy the plaintiff's claim herein pleaded to.
FORM No. 17.
(Signed.)
(s. 163.]
Action No.
of 19
J. A. App. E, Sec. II.]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF HONGKONG,
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION.
Between 4.B., Plaintiff,
and
C.D., Defendant.
Counterclaim.
The defendant says that--
1. The contract mentioned in the statement of claim herein contained a clause whereby it was provided that the plaintiff should complete the works by the 31st March, 1909, or in default pay to the defendant $10 a day for every subsequent day during which the works should remain unfinished, and they so remained unfinished for 61 days to the 31st May, 1909.
The defendant counterclaims $610.
(Signed.)
* As amended by No. 43 of 1912 Supp. Sched.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.