1901_MAGISTRATES_ORDINANCE__1890 — Page 66

.890.

› Our

C.D.

reties

tenc-

pol.

A.D. 1890.

MAGISTRATES,

[No. 3.

741

at

o'clock in the noon or before such Magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the

,

whereby you are bound to pay the sum of

day of

should not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum.

Dated this

[L.S.]

day of

(Signed.)

Magistrate.

Form No. 30.

Adjudication of Forfeiture of Recognizance where Person bound as Principal has been convicted of an Offence which is

a Breach of the Condition.

Sections 23 and 51.

HONGKONG,

IN THE POLICE COURT AT

Before J., Esquire, a Magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said Police Court.

in-

sty

of

ing

all

J11-

The

day of

1

1

•

C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the

day of

bound in the sum of the condition of the recognizance being that should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having

:

been given that the said

has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the con- dition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said re- cognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the Magistrate's Clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of

and do also pay to for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums

day of

or by days, the first instalment to be paid ]: and if

the sum of

be paid forthwith for on or before the

for every

day of

instalments of forthwith or on or before the default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress.]

[ts.]

(Signed)

Magistrate.