.890.
› Our
C.D.
reties
tenc-
pol.
A.D. 1890.
MAGISTRATES,
[No. 3.
741
at
o'clock in the noon or before such Magistrate as may then be there, to show cause why the recognizance entered into on the
,
whereby you are bound to pay the sum of
day of
should not be adjudged to be forfeited, and why you should not be adjudged to pay that sum.
Dated this
[L.S.]
day of
(Signed.)
Magistrate.
Form No. 30.
Adjudication of Forfeiture of Recognizance where Person bound as Principal has been convicted of an Offence which is
a Breach of the Condition.
Sections 23 and 51.
HONGKONG,
IN THE POLICE COURT AT
Before J., Esquire, a Magistrate of the said Colony, sitting at the said Police Court.
in-
sty
of
ing
all
J11-
The
day of
1
1
•
C.D. (hereinafter called the defendant) was by his recognizance entered into the
day of
bound in the sum of the condition of the recognizance being that should [state condition of recognizance]; and proof having
:
been given that the said
has been convicted of the offence of having [state offence], being an offence which is in law a breach of the con-dition of the said recognizance: Therefore it is adjudged that the said re-cognizance is forfeited, and that the defendant do pay to the Magistrate's Clerk [or other person specified] the said sum of
and do also pay to for costs; and it is ordered that the said sums
day of
or by days, the first instalment to be paid ]: and if
the sum of
be paid forthwith for on or before the
for every
day of
instalments of forthwith or on or before the default is made in payment according to this adjudication and order, it is ordered [proceed as in conviction for fine to be levied by distress.]
[ts.]
(Signed)
Magistrate.