TNAG-2827-FCO40-4080-Investment-Protection-and-Promotion-Agreements-(IPPA)-betwee-1993 — Page 58

FCO40 Hong Kong Department Records 聯邦事務部香港部檔案 All

Occ Min Bank SX.

an odd decilia for Mh to take. Thuestion

did not of course cate

©

us!

Q.

19.

"NB24/9

The

Question on Hong Kong

*

Hamar air

JHannah Rely

10.9.93

France IPPA

46

that French side proposed

International

Article

the

Court of

"President of the

Justice" referred to in

11 (2) (b) should be changed to "President of

International Chamber of Commerce". The British

side explained that the reason for making such an amendment was that the French side took the view that

the International Court of Justice was

appropriate as the appointing authority. explain specifically why the role should be played by

the President of the International Chamber of

Commerce instead.

101/1

not

Please

A.

+

The French delegation first proposed to use the

"United Nations Secretary General" as the appointing

authority in Article 11(2)(b), like in the PRC/France

IPPA.

The Hong Kong delegation felt that this

reference was not appropriate for Hong Kong, given

its non-sovereign status. The French delegation then

proposed the "President of the International Chamber

of Commerce".

As

we understand it, the French delegation took the

view that the "President of the International Chamber

of Commerce" was likely to have more specialized

experience than the "President of the International Court of Justice" in the appointment of a member of

an arbitral tribunal of the kind envisaged under

As the Chinese side will be aware, the

International Chamber of Commerce is a well respected

body and through its own Court of Arbitration, it has gained considerable experience in the composition of

tribunals for settlement of investment disputes.

Article 11.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.