2
without any legally enforceable obligation to apply it
But HMG intends, as one would
for charitable.purposes.
expect in the circumstances, to apply the fund in
accordance with the donor's wishes. This is a rather
different situation from the ordinary case where property
is disposed of under the Sign Manual. In those cases,
the property is held by a third party (usually an
executor), it belongs to charity, and the Crown directs
the method of application.
3.
In the present case, where the fund is actually
vested in HMG, a Sign Manual direction might not be
necessary at all. For example, if HMG wanted a third of
the fund to go to the Institute of Cancer Research ("the
ICR"), it could simply pay over the money.
If the money
was to be paid over on certain terms, such as those set
out in the FCO's draft letter of 30th January 1989, the
sending of such a letter would, in my view, be
sufficient.
4.
However, a direction under the Sign Manual is
the way in which the Crown traditionally directs or
appoints specific charitable uses> It would certainly be
a possible method of dealing with Sir S.K. Tang's gift,
and in my view would be the most appropriate. It would
ensure that the destination of the gift is set out in a
suitably formal document, and it would avoid any question
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.