TNAG-2669-FCO40-3866-Hong-Kong-Civil-Service-1993 — Page 82

21-SEP-1993 13:01

G.I.S.

+ 852 845 9078 P.004/009

2.

Q6.

Is this not another blow to

Administrative Service following Barrie Wiggham to Washington?

localisation in the appointment of

the

Both appointments are in Hong Kong's best overall interests. Both men

A6.

their respective jobs.

Q7.

A7.

Q8.

A8.

A9.

A9.

very well qualified to do

Will Sir David receive compensation for leaving office?

When he was originally appointed as Chief Secretary Sir David had a legitimate expectation to serve until reaching the age of 60 in 1995. To this extent he would have some claim for compensation. As he will continue to be employed by the Hong Kong Government, albeit at a slightly lower rank, beyond the age of 60 it has been mutually agreed that the question of compensation does not arise.

Is the Commissioner, London post a "Principal Official" post and, if so, why appoint someone unqualified to fill it?

The Commissioner, London post happens to be ranked as a Secretary, Government Secretariat post

for administrative convenience. But of course it is not a "Policy Secretary" post. But in any case Sir David Ford's appoint will come to an end before the transfer in sovereignty.

Is it necessary to create a post to accommodate

Sir David?

No. The post already exists.